首页> 外文期刊>Pravoprimenenie >ЛИЦЕНЗИРОВАНИЕ И СЕРТИФИКАЦИЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ НЕГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫХ СУДЕБНО-ЭКСПЕРТНЫХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ: ТЕОРИЯ, ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО, ПРАВОПРИМЕНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПРАКТИКА (УГОЛОВНО-ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫЙ АСПЕКТ)
【24h】

ЛИЦЕНЗИРОВАНИЕ И СЕРТИФИКАЦИЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ НЕГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫХ СУДЕБНО-ЭКСПЕРТНЫХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ: ТЕОРИЯ, ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО, ПРАВОПРИМЕНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПРАКТИКА (УГОЛОВНО-ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫЙ АСПЕКТ)

机译:非政府司法机构活动的许可和证明:理论,法律,执法实践(刑事程序方面)

获取原文
           

摘要

This article comprehensively and adequately considered some theoretical and practical aspects concerning the types of expert activities, the implementation of which non-state forensic-expert institution should have an appropriate license issued by them in the manner prescribed by law. Reflected the current system of voluntary certification for the test subject non-state forensic activities. The analysis of judicial practice on sample questions provided law enforcement mistakes of actors eligible to appoint a forensic examination in the criminal case, invited some of the trends of the current legislation. As shown in the examples, despite explicit legal requirements on licensing of certain types of expertise-there are still violations of non-state forensic agencies. Regarding the certification of the institutions, we note that the absence in the law on forensic examination requirements for mandatory certification activities of non-state forensic institutions allow these organizations to make a decision about the need of certification of their activities. This approach of the legislator to the activities of non-state forensic institutions in light of the discussion in this section is not correct, in view of what we have proposed recommendations to improve normative-legal regulation in the field of forensics.
机译:本文全面,充分地考虑了有关专家活动类型的一些理论和实践方面,非国家法医专家机构应按照法律规定的方式颁发适当的执照,以实施这些活动。反映了当前针对测试对象的非国家司法鉴定活动的自愿认证体系。对样本问题的司法实践分析为有资格在刑事案件中任命法医检查的行为者提供了执法失误,并引发了当前立法的一些趋势。如示例所示,尽管对某些类型的专业知识的许可有明确的法律要求,但仍然存在违反非州法证机构的情况。关于机构的认证,我们注意到法律中对非国家法证机构强制性认证活动的法医检查要求的缺失,使这些组织可以决定是否对其活动进行认证。鉴于本节中我们提出的改善法医学领域规范性法律法规的建议,鉴于本节中的讨论,立法者对非国家法证机构活动的这种做法是不正确的。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号