...
首页> 外文期刊>Primary care companion to the journal of clinical psychiatry >Clinical Use of the emDSM/em Categorical Diagnostic System During the Mental Health Intake Session
【24h】

Clinical Use of the emDSM/em Categorical Diagnostic System During the Mental Health Intake Session

机译: DSM 分类诊断系统在心理健康摄入期间的临床应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The primary purpose of diagnostic systems is to improve the care of individuals suffering from mental disorders. Yet, few studies have explored the clinical use of the DSM. Here, we investigated clinicians’ methods of obtaining and using diagnostic information during the mental health intake session. We examined the specific diagnostic information collected in usual care using unstructured interviews and the way this information was applied to make diagnostic decisions within naturalistic settings. We compared these decisions to diagnoses made using independent structured diagnostic interviews that served as the gold standard for psychiatric diagnosis. Finally, we examined ways to improve diagnostic efficiency by identifying the best probes for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) in naturalistic settings. Method: A total of 122 intake sessions in 4 community mental health clinics in Israel were audiotaped. Data were collected from October 2012 to April 2013. Immediately following the intake, clinicians listed the service user’s diagnoses according to the DSM-IV while the service user completed a structured diagnostic interview with an independent interviewer. Recorded intake sessions were coded by independent clinicians using an information checklist. Results: Overall, clinicians tended to underuse the DSM, not collecting sufficient information to establish a correct diagnosis for most disorders. Accuracy of diagnostic decisions for MDD improved when only 2 screener items (depressed mood and diminished interest or pleasure) were assessed, compared to assessing 5 or more criteria as required by DSM-IV (diagnostic odds ratios = 9.44 and 3.85, respectively). Conclusion: The problem of missing diagnostic information may underlie the poor reliability of the clinical diagnostic decision process. Systematically evaluating clinicians’ assessment process in regular care can help identify the best probes to use in clinical practice to increase diagnostic efficiency.
机译:目的:诊断系统的主要目的是改善精神障碍患者的护理。但是,很少有研究探索DSM的临床用途。在这里,我们调查了临床医生在精神健康摄入期间获取和使用诊断信息的方法。我们使用非结构化访谈检查了通常护理中收集的特定诊断信息,以及该信息在自然环境中用于做出诊断决策的方式。我们将这些决策与使用独立的结构化诊断访谈(作为精神病学诊断的金标准)进行的诊断进行了比较。最后,我们研究了通过鉴定在自然环境下诊断主要抑郁症(MDD)的最佳探针来提高诊断效率的方法。方法:对以色列4个社区精神卫生诊所的122摄入量录音。数据是从2012年10月至2013年4月收集的。摄入后,临床医生会根据DSM-IV列出服务使用者的诊断,而服务使用者则需要与独立访调员进行结构化的诊断访谈。记录的摄入量由独立临床医生使用信息清单进行编码。结果:总的来说,临床医生倾向于未充分利用DSM,没有收集足够的信息来为大多数疾病建立正确的诊断。与仅根据DSM-IV要求评估5个或更多标准(诊断比值比分别为9.44和3.85)相比,仅评估2个筛查项目(情绪低落,兴趣或愉悦度降低)时,MDD诊断决策的准确性得到了提高。结论:缺少诊断信息的问题可能是临床诊断决策过程可靠性差的原因。系统地评估临床医生在常规护理中的评估过程,可以帮助确定在临床实践中使用的最佳探针,以提高诊断效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号