...
首页> 外文期刊>Paediatrics & Child Health >Investigation of test characteristics of two screening tools in comparison with a gold standard assessment to detect developmental delay at 36 months: A pilot study
【24h】

Investigation of test characteristics of two screening tools in comparison with a gold standard assessment to detect developmental delay at 36 months: A pilot study

机译:一项初步研究调查了两种筛选工具的测试特性,并与检测36个月发育延迟的金标准评估进行了比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The ability of the Rourke Baby Record (Rourke) and the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) to detect developmental delay is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the test characteristics of the Rourke and NDDS compared with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III for detecting developmental delay in high-risk children. METHODS: Three-year-olds were recruited from the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia). Two cut-points were evaluated (one and two or more areas of concern) from the Rourke and NDDS, and were compared with a score of ≤85 on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. RESULTS: The majority (67.7%) of the 31 participants reported no concern. At one area of concern, sensitivity was 75% for both the Rourke and NDDS. When two areas of concern were noted, specificity was 93% for the Rourke and 96% for NDDS. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Rourke and the NDDS appear to be reasonably sensitive and specific, but further investigation is warranted.
机译:背景:Rourke婴儿记录(Rourke)和Nipissing District发育筛查(NDDS)检测发育迟缓的能力尚不清楚。目的:确定Rourke和NDDS与Bayley婴儿和幼儿发展量表III的测试特征,以检测高危儿童的发育迟缓。方法:从IWK健康中心(新斯科舍省哈利法克斯)招募三岁的孩子。从Rourke和NDDS评估了两个切入点(一个和两个或多个关注领域),并与Bayley婴幼儿发展量表III中的得分≤85进行了比较。结果:31名参与者中的大多数(67.7%)表示无忧。在一个值得关注的领域,Rourke和NDDS的灵敏度均为75%。当注意到两个令人关注的领域时,Rourke的特异性为93%,NDDS的特异性为96%。结论:Rourke和NDDS似乎都相当敏感和具体,但是有必要作进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号