...
首页> 外文期刊>Polish Archives of Internal Medicine >Differences in outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease managed by cardiologists versus noncardiologists. Results from the international prospective CLARIFY registry
【24h】

Differences in outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease managed by cardiologists versus noncardiologists. Results from the international prospective CLARIFY registry

机译:由心脏病专家和非心脏病专家管理的稳定冠心病患者的结局差异。国际预期的CLARIFY注册中心的结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION Clinical outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may differ between those primarily managed by cardiologists versus noncardiologists. OBJECTIVES Our main objective was to analyze the clinical outcomes of outpatients with stable CAD in relation to the specialty of the managing physicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied 32 468 outpatients with stable CAD included in the CLARIFY registry, with up to 4 years of follow?up data. Cardiologists provided medical care in 84.1% and noncardiologists in 15.9% of the patients. Primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. RESULTS Important differences in management as well as demographic and clinical characteristics were observed between the groups at baseline. Patients treated by cardiologists were younger and more of them had dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes. The use of β?blockers and thienopyridines, as well as history of percutaneous coronary intervention were more frequent in this group. More patients treated by noncardiologists had a history of MI as well as concomitant peripheral artery disease and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. They also had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and more often received lipid?lowering drugs. After adjustment for baseline differences, patients treated by cardiolo
机译:简介冠心病稳定的患者(CAD)的临床结局在主要由心脏病专家和非心脏病专家管理的患者之间可能有所不同。目的我们的主要目的是分析与管理医师的专长有关的,具有稳定CAD的门诊患者的临床结果。患者与方法我们研究了32 468名CLARIFY登记册中包含稳定CAD的门诊患者,并获得了长达4年的随访数据。心脏病专家提供医疗护理的比例为84.1%,非心脏病专家提供的护理比例为15.9%。主要结局是心血管死亡,非致命性心肌梗塞(MI)或中风的综合结果。结果在基线时,各组之间在管理以及人口统计学和临床​​特征方面存在重要差异。由心脏病专家治疗的患者年龄较小,并且患有血脂异常,高血压和糖尿病的人数更多。该组中β受体阻滞剂和噻吩并吡啶类药物的使用以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的历史更为频繁。由非心脏科医师治疗的更多患者有MI史,并伴有外周动脉疾病和哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病。他们还具有较低的左心室射血分数,并且更经常接受降脂药物。调整基线差异后,接受心律失常治疗的患者

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号