...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Adherence clubs and decentralized medication delivery to support patient retention and sustained viral suppression in care: Results from a cluster-randomized evaluation of differentiated ART delivery models in South Africa
【24h】

Adherence clubs and decentralized medication delivery to support patient retention and sustained viral suppression in care: Results from a cluster-randomized evaluation of differentiated ART delivery models in South Africa

机译:依从性俱乐部和分散式药物输送,以支持患者在护理中的保留和持续的病毒抑制:南非差异化ART输送模型的聚类随机评估结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models, in which patients are provided with care relevant to their current status (e.g., newly initiating, stable on treatment, or unstable on treatment) has become an essential part of patient-centered health systems. In 2015, the South African government implemented Chronic Disease Adherence Guidelines (AGLs), which involved five interventions: Fast Track Initiation Counseling for newly initiating patients, Enhanced Adherence Counseling for patients with an unsuppressed viral load, Early Tracing of patients who miss visits, and Adherence Clubs (ACs) and Decentralized Medication Delivery (DMD) for stable patients. We evaluated two of these interventions in 24 South African facilities: ACs, in which patients meet in groups outside usual clinic procedures and receive medication; and DMD, in which patients pick up their medication outside usual pharmacy queues. Methods and findings We compared those participating in ACs or receiving DMD at intervention sites to those eligible for ACs or DMD at control sites. Outcomes were retention and sustained viral suppression (400 copies/mL) 12 months after AC or DMD enrollment (or comparable time for controls). 12 facilities were randomly allocated to intervention and 12 to control arms in four provinces (Gauteng, North West, Limpopo, and KwaZulu Natal). We calculated adjusted risk differences (aRDs) with cluster adjustment using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) using difference in differences (DiD) with patients eligible for ACs/DMD prior to implementation (Jan 1, 2015) for comparison. For DMD, randomization was not preserved, and the analysis was treated as observational. For ACs, 275 intervention and 294 control patients were enrolled; 72% of patients were female, 61% were aged 30–49 years, and median CD4 count at ART initiation was 268 cells/μL. AC patients had higher 1-year retention (89.5% versus 81.6%, aRD: 8.3%; 95% CI: 1.1% to 15.6%) and comparable sustained 1-year viral suppression (400 copies/mL any time ≤ 18 months) (80.0% versus 79.6%, aRD: 3.8%; 95% CI: ?6.9% to 14.4%). Retention associations were apparently stronger for men than women (men RD: 13.1%, 95% CI: 0.3% to 23.5%; women RD: 6.0%, 95% CI: ?0.9% to 12.9%). For DMD, 232 intervention and 346 control patients were enrolled; 71% of patients were female, 65% were aged 30–49 years, and median CD4 count at ART initiation was 270 cells/μL. DMD patients had apparently lower retention (81.5% versus 87.2%, aRD: ?5.9%; 95% CI: ?12.5% to 0.8%) and comparable viral suppression versus standard of care (77.2% versus 74.3%, aRD: ?1.0%; 95% CI: ?12.2% to 10.1%), though in both cases, our findings were imprecise. We also noted apparently increased viral suppression among men (RD: 11.1%; 95% CI: ?3.4% to 25.5%). The main study limitations were missing data and lack of randomization in the DMD analysis. Conclusions In this study, we found comparable DMD outcomes versus standard of care at facilities, a benefit for retention of patients in care with ACs, and apparent benefits in terms of retention (for AC patients) and sustained viral suppression (for DMD patients) among men. This suggests the importance of alternative service delivery models for men and of community-based strategies to decongest primary healthcare facilities. Because these strategies also reduce patient inconvenience and decongest clinics, comparable outcomes are a potential success. The cost of all five AGL interventions and possible effects on reducing clinic congestion should be investigated.
机译:背景技术差异化抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)交付模型已成为以患者为中心的卫生系​​统的重要组成部分,其中向患者提供与其当前状态相关的护理(例如,新开始,治疗稳定或治疗不稳定)。 2015年,南非政府实施了《慢性病依从性指南》(AGLs),其中涉及五项干预措施:针对初发患者的快速启动咨询,针对病毒载量不受抑制的患者的增强依从性咨询,对未就诊患者的早期追踪以及稳定患者的依从性俱乐部(AC)和分散式药物递送(DMD)。我们在南非的24个机构中评估了其中两种干预措施:AC,其中患者在常规诊所程序之外的小组聚会并接受药物治疗;和DMD,在这种情况下,患者可以在通常的药房排队之外接听药物。方法和发现我们比较了参加AC或在干预现场接受DMD的人群与在对照场所接受AC或DMD的人群。结果是入选AC或DMD后12个月(或对照组的可比时间)保留并持续抑制病毒(<400拷贝/ mL)。在四个省(豪登省,西北地区,林波波省和夸祖鲁纳塔尔省)中,随机分配了12个设施进行干预,并分配12个控制武器。我们采用广义估计方程(GEE)通过聚类调整计算了调整后的风险差异(aRD),其中使用了差异(DiD)与符合ACs / DMD资格的患者在实施之前(2015年1月1日)进行比较。对于DMD,不保留随机化,并且将分析视为观察性分析。对于ACs,招募了275名干预患者和294名对照患者。 72%的患者为女性,61%的患者年龄在30-49岁之间,ART起始时CD4的中位数为268细胞/μL。 AC患者具有较高的1年保留率(89.5%对81.6%,aRD:8.3%; 95%CI:1.1%至15.6%)和相当的持续1年病毒抑制(在≤18个月的任何时间<400拷贝/ mL) (80.0%对79.6%,aRD:3.8%; 95%CI:?6.9%至14.4%)。男性的保留关联性明显强于女性(男性RD:13.1%,95%CI:0.3%至23.5%;女性RD:6.0%,95%CI:0.9%至12.9%)。对于DMD,共纳入232例干预措施和346例对照患者。 71%的患者为女性,65%的患者年龄在30-49岁之间,ART起始时CD4的中位数为270细胞/μL。 DMD患者的retention留率明显降低(81.5%对87.2%,aRD:≤5.9%; 95%CI:≤12.5%至0.8%),并且病毒抑制与护理水平相当(77.2%对74.3%,aRD:≤1.0%) ; 95%CI:?12.2%至10.1%),尽管在这两种情况下,我们的发现都是不准确的。我们还注意到男性的病毒抑制作用明显增加(RD:11.1%; 95%CI:?3.4%至25.5%)。研究的主要局限性是DMD分析中缺少数据和缺乏随机性。结论在这项研究中,我们发现DMD的结果与设施的标准护理水平相当,在保留AC的患者中受益较大,在保留方面(对于AC患者)和持续的病毒抑制(对于DMD患者)具有明显的益处。男人们这表明了替代性服务提供模式对于男性的重要性以及基于社区的策略减轻主要医疗设施拥挤的重要性。由于这些策略还减少了患者的不便和诊所拥挤,因此可比较的结果是潜在的成功。应该研究所有五种AGL干预措施的成本以及对减少临床拥堵的可能影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号