首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Genetics >A less selfish view of genome size evolution in maize
【24h】

A less selfish view of genome size evolution in maize

机译:玉米基因组大小进化的自私观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Genome size varies by many orders of magnitude across plants and animals, but resolving the most important evolutionary forces driving this variation remains challenging. Since eukaryotic genome size variation is not associated with complexity, genetic drift of the amount of noncoding DNA could dominate, implicating population and species history as key drivers of shifts in DNA content. Alternatively, directional selection could be acting on DNA content, but if so, it has not been resolved which level of selection is most important. Since the predominant component of many eukaryotic genomes is comprised of selfish genetic elements such as transposable elements (TEs) and regions subject to meiotic drive, factors that influence their differential success across populations and species could account for much of the variation in genome size. However, DNA content can also have important effects on organismal phenotype that could be under directional selection. Genome size may often be an important determinant of cell size and division rate and the subject of selection via its effects on developmental and metabolic phenotypes [ 1 , 2 ]. Supporting this view, correlations of genome size with invasive potential and growth rate [ 3 ], regional abundance and seed size [ 4 ], and even metabolic intensity in flying birds [ 5 ], may suggest an adaptive role. In this issue, Bilinski et al. [ 6 ] present evidence for this organismal adaptation view of genome size evolution by providing an explicit test for natural selection on genome size and repeat abundance across multiple altitudinal clines in maize and its wild relatives and identifying the underlying physiological mechanism. Bilinski et al. [ 6 ] capitalize on the remarkable genome size variation in maize and its wild relatives, which differ by 40%–70% within and between subspecies. It is estimated that 85% of the maize genome is composed of TEs, B chromosomes, and heterochromatic knobs subject to meiotic drive [ 7 , 8 ], highlighting the success of selfish genetic elements in this lineage. Nevertheless, clines of genome size along with phenotypic and environmental variables in Zea mays spp. have been well described, with a number of studies showing evidence of genome reductions, including the loss of knobs and B chromosomes, in regions of high altitude and latitude [ 9 – 13 ]. While these parallel clines are suggestive of an adaptive process, it has been difficult to definitively demonstrate this and fully reject a role for neutral population history. Bilinski et al. [ 6 ] add to this rich literature by using a quantitative genetics framework to conduct a test of local adaptation, recognizing that genome size is a trait governed by an immense number of small-effect loci. Moreover, it can be thought of as a quantitative trait under complete genetic control, since the variation in genome size is expected to be a simple function of the net number of insertion and deletion alleles individuals have across the genome. Under this framework, a neutral model predicts that genome size differences across a geographic region are a function of the relatedness and population structure [ 14 ] and thus determined by the extent of correlated allele frequencies between a given pair of individuals. It follows that if genome size is subject to selection, it should be more strongly correlated with altitude than expected from relatedness alone. The authors use low-coverage whole genome sequence data from three altitudinal clines to obtain detailed information not only about the kinship and structure of their samples but also about the contribution of each type of repeat to overall genome size. Using this approach to test for local adaptation, the authors are able to reject the predictions of the neutral model, concluding that genome size differences along altitudinal clines are too extreme to be explained solely by drift ( Fig 1 ). When considering individual repeat types, both TEs and knob repeat abundance are significantly correlated with altitude. They also find that one type of knob repeat, known as TR1, shows the strongest over-differentiation, and the signal of altitudinal adaptation on TR1 abundance remains significant even when controlling for genome size. With megabase-long heterochromatic knobs accounting for up to 10% of maize genome size variation [ 7 , 15 ], knobs seem to be acting as large-effect loci for genome size but, in some cases, may also be under additional selection pressures independent of their effects on genome size. Although TEs do not show signals of adaptation after controlling for genome size, the strong correlation of TE copy number with genome size and altitude implies that environmental adaptation could also be an important determinant of TE abundance mediated through its effects on genome size. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007249.g001 Fig 1 Altitudinal clines in maize and teosinte. Clines in heterochromatic knobs and genome size in Zea mays spp. are significan
机译:基因组的大小在动植物之间变化了多个数量级,但是解决驱动这种变化的最重要的进化力仍然具有挑战性。由于真核基因组大小的变化与复杂性无关,因此非编码DNA数量的遗传漂移可能占主导地位,这暗示着种群和物种历史是DNA含量变化的主要驱动力。或者,定向选择可能作用于DNA含量,但如果是这样,则尚未决定哪个选择水平最重要。由于许多真核生物基因组的主要组成部分都由自私的遗传元素组成,例如转座因子(TEs)和受减数分裂驱动的区域,因此影响其在种群和物种间成功的差异的因素可能会导致基因组大小的大部分变异。但是,DNA含量也可能对生物表型产生重要影响,可能是在方向选择下。基因组大小通常可能是细胞大小和分裂率的重要决定因素,而选择对象则取决于其对发育和代谢表型的影响[1、2]。支持这一观点的基因组大小与侵袭潜力和生长率[3],区域丰度和种子大小[4],甚至是飞鸟的代谢强度[5]之间的相关性,可能暗示了一种适应性作用。在这个问题上,Bilinski等。 [6]通过提供对玉米及其野生近缘种的多个垂直海拔的基因组大小和重复丰度的自然选择的明确测试,并为潜在的生理机制提供了明确的测试,从而为这种有机体对基因组大小演变的适应性观点提供了证据。 Bilinski等。 [6]利用玉米及其野生近缘种的显着基因组大小变异,这些变异在亚种内部和亚种之间相差40%–70%。据估计,玉米基因组的85%由TEs,B染色体和易受减数分裂驱动的异色结组成[7,8],这突出说明了该谱系中自私遗传元件的成功。然而,玉米的基因组大小以及表型和环境变量的变化。已有很好的描述,许多研究表明在高海拔和纬度地区基因组减少的证据,包括结节和B染色体的丢失[9-13]。虽然这些平行的线索暗示了适应性过程,但很难确切地证明这一点并完全拒绝中性人口史的作用。 Bilinski等。 [6]通过使用定量遗传学框架进行局部适应性测试,增加了这一丰富的文献,认识到基因组大小是由大量小效应基因座控制的特征。此外,由于基因组大小的变化被认为是个体在基因组中具有插入和缺失等位基因的净数目的简单函数,因此可以将其视为完全遗传控制下的定量性状。在这种框架下,中性模型预测整个地理区域的基因组大小差异是相关性和种群结构的函数[14],因此由给定一对个体之间相关等位基因频率的程度决定。因此,如果要选择基因组大小,则它与海拔的相关性应比单独从相关性中获得的强度更强。作者使用来自三个垂直谱系的低覆盖率全基因组序列数据来获得详细信息,这些信息不仅涉及其样本的亲缘关系和结构,而且还涉及每种重复类型对整体基因组大小的贡献。使用这种方法测试局部适应性,作者能够拒绝中性模型的预测,得出结论认为,沿海拔谱系的基因组大小差异太大,无法仅通过漂移来解释(图1)。当考虑单个重复类型时,TE和旋钮重复丰度都与海拔高度显着相关。他们还发现一种称为TR1的纽扣重复序列显示出最强的过度分化,即使控制基因组大小,高度对TR1丰度的适应信号仍然很重要。兆碱基长的异色结节占玉米基因组大小变异的10%[7,15],结节似乎对基因组大小起着很大的作用位点,但在某些情况下,可能还受到其他选择压力的独立影响。对基因组大小的影响尽管在控制基因组大小后TE并没有显示出适应信号,但是TE拷贝数与基因组大小和高度的强烈相关性暗示环境适应性也可能是TE丰度对其基因组大小的影响所介导的重要决定因素。 10.1371 / journal.pgen.1007249.g001图1玉米和teosinte中的垂直谱系。杂色花序中的Cline和玉米中的基因组大小。是重要的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号