首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Computational Biology >Modeling neuronal avalanches and long-range temporal correlations at the emergence of collective oscillations: Continuously varying exponents mimic M/EEG results
【24h】

Modeling neuronal avalanches and long-range temporal correlations at the emergence of collective oscillations: Continuously varying exponents mimic M/EEG results

机译:在集体振荡出现时模拟神经元雪崩和长期时间相关性:连续变化的指数模仿M / EEG结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Author summary Since the first experimental observation of scale-invariant neuronal avalanches, the idea that the brain could be operating near a phase transition has received much attention. But if the brain is critical, what is the phase transition? Experimentally, the sizes and durations of local field potential (LFP) avalanches were power-law distributed with exponents 3/2 and 2. Theoretically, these are the exponents of a critical branching process, a coincidence which has inspired many models with a common feature: a phase transition from a silent (absorbing) to an active phase. These models, however, struggle with another experimental result: brain activity can also exhibit long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs, another fingerprint of a critical system). An attempt to model both phenomena was put forward via the CROS (CRitical OScillations) model, in which neuronal avalanches and LRTCs were observed at a transition where alpha-band oscillations emerge. We show that the avalanche exponents of the CROS model do not necessarily agree with those of a critical branching process, but can vary near the transition region, just like the exponents governing LRTCs. Moreover, the spread of exponents observed in the model is in good agreement with experimental results from human MEG data.
机译:作者总结自首次对规模不变的神经元雪崩进行实验观察以来,大脑可能在相变附近工作的想法受到了广泛关注。但是,如果大脑至关重要,则相变是什么?实验上,局部场电势(LFP)雪崩的大小和持续时间是幂律分布的,指数为3/2和2。从理论上讲,这些是关键分支过程的指数,这是巧合,启发了许多具有共同特征的模型:从无声(吸收)到活动阶段的相变。但是,这些模型与另一项实验结果相抵触:大脑活动还可能表现出长期的时间相关性(LRTC,是关键系统的另一种指纹)。试图通过CROS(CRitical OScillations)模型对这两种现象进行建模,其中在出现α波段振荡的跃迁中观察到神经元雪崩和LRTC。我们显示,CROS模型的雪崩指数不一定与关键分支过程的雪崩指数一致,但在过渡区域附近可能会变化,就像控制LRTC的指数一样。此外,在模型中观察到的指数分布与人类MEG数据的实验结果高度吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号