首页> 外文期刊>Policy and Society >Three competing interpretations of policy problems: tame and wicked problems through the lenses of population aging
【24h】

Three competing interpretations of policy problems: tame and wicked problems through the lenses of population aging

机译:对政策问题的三种相互竞争的解释:通过人口老龄化的视角解决温和和邪恶的问题

获取原文
           

摘要

This contribution presents competing lenses of population aging as policy problems and it compares their impact on the treatment of policy problems. Three lenses are analysed: intergenerational, biomedical and social gerontological. The intergenerational lens treats population aging as a new form of class conflict along age groups. The social gerontological lens claims that population aging is first and foremost a social issue and it stands in opposition to the dominance of biomedical approaches that treat aging as a pathology. The presence of these three alternative conceptions of the policy problem is indicative of the complexity surrounding population aging and the importance of having divergent definitions of policy problems. Via an analysis of informal care giving in the Canadian context, this contribution also presents a comparison of the three lenses with a focus on the roots of these conceptualisations in various disciplines, their prevalence in various public organisations, and the policy consequences of their strength or weakness.
机译:这一贡献提出了人口老龄化的竞争镜头作为政策问题,并比较了它们对政策问题处理的影响。分析了三种透镜:代间,生物医学和社会老年学。代际镜头将人口老龄化视为沿着年龄组的阶级冲突的一种新形式。社会老年学的观点认为,人口老龄化首先是一个社会问题,它与将老龄化视为病理学的生物医学方法的优势相反。政策问题的这三个替代概念的出现表明了人口老龄化的复杂性以及对政策问题有不同定义的重要性。通过对加拿大背景下非正式护理的分析,本文也对这三种观点进行了比较,重点是这些概念在各个学科中的根源,它们在各个公共组织中的盛行以及其实力或力量所带来的政策后果。弱点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号