首页> 外文期刊>Policy and Society >Higher education regionalism in Europe and Southeast Asia: Comparing policy ideas
【24h】

Higher education regionalism in Europe and Southeast Asia: Comparing policy ideas

机译:欧洲和东南亚的高等教育区域主义:比较政策思路

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Regional cooperation in the higher education policy sector has been on the rise throughout the last decades. In this article, we compare and analyse two instances of higher education regionalisms (i.e. political projects of higher education region creation) in Europe and South-East Asia from an ideational perspective. In so doing, we engage with and challenge the diffusion argument common in both European higher education studies (‘Bologna Process export thesis’) and new comparative regionalism. Using publicly accessible documents from regional bodies active in higher education policy coordination, and 53 semi-structured interviews with key policy actors involved in these developments, we identify the policy ideas of European and South-East Asian higher education regionalisms, and consider whether the extant models of regional cooperation and the knowledge discourse affected their evolution. Our findings indicate that the ‘Bologna Process export thesis’ and the diffusion assumptions of comparative regionalism are too simplistic and misleading. We conclude with suggestions for scholars interested in new comparative regionalism.
机译:在过去的几十年中,高等教育政策领域的区域合作一直在增长。在本文中,我们从概念角度比较和分析了欧洲和东南亚的两个高等教育区域主义(即高等教育区域创建的政治项目)实例。在这种情况下,我们参与并挑战了欧洲高等教育研究(“博洛尼亚进程出口论文”)和新的比较区域主义中常见的扩散论点。利用活跃于高等教育政策协调的区域机构的公开文件,以及对参与这些发展的主要政策参与者的53次半结构化访谈,我们确定了欧洲和东南亚高等教育区域主义的政策构想,并考虑是否存在区域合作和知识话语的模式影响了它们的发展。我们的发现表明,“博洛尼亚进程出口理论”和比较区域主义的扩散假设过于简单和误导。最后,我们为对新的比较区域主义感兴趣的学者提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号