首页> 外文期刊>Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology >Real-time interactive planning for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy
【24h】

Real-time interactive planning for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy

机译:体积调制弧光治疗头颈癌放射治疗的实时交互式计划

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and purpose Planning complex radiotherapy treatments can be inefficient, with large variation in plan quality. In this study we evaluated plan quality and planning efficiency using real-time interactive planning (RTIP) for head and neck (HN) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and methods RTIP allows manipulation of dose volume histograms (DVHs) in real-time to assess achievable planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organ at risk (OAR) sparing. For 20 HN patients previously treated with VMAT, RTIP was used to minimize OAR dose while maintaining PTV coverage. RTIP DVHs were used to guide VMAT optimization. Dosimetric differences between RTIP-assisted plans and original clinical plans were assessed. Five blinded radiation oncologists indicated their preference for each PTV, OAR and overall plan. To assess efficiency, ten patients were planned de novo by experienced and novice planners and a RTIP user. Results The average planning time with RTIP was 20?min, and most plans required only one optimization. All 20 RTIP plans were preferred by a majority of oncologists due to improvements in OAR sparing. The average maximum dose to the spinal cord was reduced by 10.5?Gy (from 49.5 to 39.0?Gy), and the average mean doses for the oral cavity, laryngopharynx, contralateral parotid and submandibular glands were reduced by 3.5?Gy (39.1–35.7?Gy), 6.8?Gy (42.5–35.7?Gy), 1.7?Gy (17.0–15.3?Gy) and 3.3?Gy (22.9–19.5?Gy), respectively. Conclusions Incorporating RTIP into clinical workflows may increase both planning efficiency and OAR sparing.
机译:背景和目的计划复杂的放射治疗可能效率低下,计划质量会有很大差异。在这项研究中,我们使用实时交互式计划(RTIP)评估头颈部(HN)体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)的计划质量和计划效率。材料和方法RTIP允许实时处理剂量体积直方图(DVH),以评估可实现的计划目标体积(PTV)覆盖率和器官风险(OAR)节省。对于之前接受过VMAT治疗的20例HN患者,使用RTIP使OAR剂量降至最低,同时保持PTV覆盖率。 RTIP DVH用于指导VMAT优化。评估了RTIP辅助计划和原始临床计划之间的剂量差异。五位不知情的放射肿瘤学家表示他们偏爱每种PTV,OAR和总体计划。为了评估效率,由经验丰富的和新手计划者以及RTIP用户从头计划了十名患者。结果使用RTIP的平均计划时间少于20分钟,并且大多数计划仅需要一次优化。由于OAR节省的改进,所有20种RTIP计划都被大多数肿瘤学家所偏爱。脊髓的平均最大剂量减少了10.5?Gy(从49.5降至39.0?Gy),口腔,喉咽,对侧腮腺和下颌下腺的平均平均剂量减少了3.5?Gy(39.1–35.7) (Gy),6.8(Gy(42.5-35.7Gy)),1.7(Gy(17.0-15.3Gy)和3.3(Gy)(22.9-19.5Gy)。结论将RTIP纳入临床工作流程可以提高计划效率和节省OAR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号