首页> 外文期刊>Parasite >Preventive efficacy of Frontline? Combo and Certifect? against Dipylidium caninum infestation of cats and dogs using a natural flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestation model
【24h】

Preventive efficacy of Frontline? Combo and Certifect? against Dipylidium caninum infestation of cats and dogs using a natural flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestation model

机译:前线的预防功效?组合和认证?使用天然跳蚤(Ctenocephalides felis)侵染模型对猫和狗的犬瘟热的侵染

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two studies were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two monthly topical anti-flea products for the prevention of Dipylidium caninum infestations in cats and dogs. A single treatment with Frontline? Combo spot-on for cats (fipronil-(S)-methoprene) and two successive monthly treatments of Certifect? for dogs (fipronil-amitraz-(S)-methoprene) were assessed for the prevention of D. caninum infestations following weekly challenges of treated cats or dogs with metacestode naturally-infected fleas. The rate of infestations using the model in cats versus dogs explains the choice of a 1-month trial in cats and a 2-month trial in dogs. The experimental flea-infection model resulted in a range of 22–53% of the fleas being infected by Dipylidium cysticercoids. The arithmetic mean flea counts recorded for the untreated cats ranged from 51.2 to 68. The geometric mean flea counts recorded for the Frontline Combo treated cats differed significantly (p?p?D. caninum proglottids by cats, 100% (6/6) of the control cats and 0% (0/6) of Frontline Combo treated cats were infested with D. caninum. Frontline Combo spot-on for cats was therefore 100% effective in preventing infection with D. caninum. In dogs, 7 out of the 8 control group dogs (87.5%) produced proglottids following infestation of infected fleas, whereas 0 out of 8 dogs (0%) in the treated group were infected. The infection rates of the two groups were significantly different. The percent effectiveness for the Certifect treatment group for the prevention of D. caninum infection was 100% during this 2-month trial. No treatment-related adverse events were observed in either cats or dogs during these studies.
机译:进行了两项研究,以评估两种每月使用的局部抗跳蚤产品在猫和狗中预防犬瘟热的效果。使用Frontline进行单一治疗?对猫(氟苯腈-(S)-美沙戊烯)进行组合注射和连续两个月连续治疗Certifect?在每周一次对经过治疗的猫或狗的自然代谢跳蚤感染的猫或狗进行每周一次攻击后,对狗的Fipronil-Amitraz-(S)-美沙芬进行了评估,以预防犬D.犬侵扰。在猫与狗中使用该模型的感染率说明了选择在猫中进行1个月的试验,在狗中进行2个月的试验。实验性跳蚤感染模型导致22-53%的跳蚤被双嘧啶类半胱氨酸感染。未经处理的猫的算术平均跳蚤计数范围为51.2至68。通过Frontline Combo处理的猫的几何平均跳蚤计数差异显着(p?p?D。猫的犬牙根glo,100%(6/6)对照猫中有0%(0/6%)的前线组合猫被D. caninum感染,因此猫的Frontline Combo点染在预防犬D. caninum感染方面有效率为100%(7)。对照组中的8只狗中,有87.5%的狗因感染跳蚤而产生了臭glo,而治疗组中的8只狗中有0只(0%)被感染,两组的感染率明显不同。在这个为期2个月的试验中,Certifect治疗组预防犬D. caninum感染的有效率为100%,在这些研究中,猫或狗均未观察到与治疗相关的不良事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号