An extensive laboratory testing program was conducted to investigate the shear strength of prestressed concrete girders. A comparison between the various models for predicti'/> Shear Behavior of Full-Scale Prestressed Concrete Girders: Comparison Between AASHTO Specifications and LRFD Code
首页> 外文期刊>PCI journal >Shear Behavior of Full-Scale Prestressed Concrete Girders: Comparison Between AASHTO Specifications and LRFD Code
【24h】

Shear Behavior of Full-Scale Prestressed Concrete Girders: Comparison Between AASHTO Specifications and LRFD Code

机译:大型预应力混凝土梁的抗剪性能:AASHTO规范与LRFD代码之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

style="text-align: left;">An extensive laboratory testing program was conducted to investigate the shear strength of prestressed concrete girders. A comparison between the various models for predicting shear strength and the  results of tests on twenty full-scale AASHTO Type II prestressed concrete girders are presented. Three of the test girders contained no shear reinforcement and were tested to determine the concrete  contribution, V, to shear strength. The main variables of this study were the amounts of shear reinforcement and the shear span. The test shear strengths are compared with predictions based on the 1989  AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges and the 1994 AASHTO LRFD Specifications. The results show that the application of the 1989 AASHTO Specifications gives a much better  prediction of shear strength than the LRFD provisions, indicating that the latter require some examination and modification to increase reliability >References>1. ACI Committee 318, a€?Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete,a€? American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1989 and 1995. >2. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1977. >3. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, Engineering Division, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1993. >4. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09011980.32.100 " title="a€?Shear and Torsion Design of Prestressed and Non-Prestressed Concrete Beams,a€? " target="_blank">a€?Shear and Torsion Design of Prestressed and Non-Prestressed Concrete Beams,a€? PCI JOURNAL, V. 25, No. 5, September- October 1980, pp. 32-100. >5. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, a€?76tlpp. 6. AASHTO, LRFD Code for the Design of Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington, D.C., 1994. >7. Shahawy, M., Robinson, B., and Batchelor, B. deV., a€?An Investigation ofShear Strength of Prestressed Concrete AASHTO Type II Girders,a€? Research Report, Structures Research Center, Florida     Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, January 1993. >8. Shahawy, M., Issa, M., and Batchelor, B. deV., href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011992.84.96 " title="a€?Strand Transfer Lengths of Full Scale AASHTO Prestressed Concrete Girders,a€?" target="_blank">a€?Strand Transfer Lengths of Full Scale AASHTO Prestressed Concrete Girders,a€? PCI JOURNAL, V. 37, No. 3, May-June 1992, pp. 84-96. 
机译:style =“ text-align:left;”>进行了广泛的实验室测试程序,以研究预应力混凝土梁的抗剪强度。介绍了各种预测抗剪强度的模型与在20个AASHTO II型全尺寸预应力混凝土大梁上的测试结果之间的比较。其中三个试验大梁不含抗剪钢筋,并进行了试验以确定混凝土对剪切强度的贡献V.这项研究的主要变量是剪切钢筋的数量和剪切跨度。将测试抗剪强度与基于1989年AASHTO公路桥梁标准规范和1994年AASHTO LRFD规范的预测进行比较。结果表明,1989年AASHTO规范的应用提供了比LRFD规定更好的抗剪强度预测,表明LRFD规定需要进行一些检查和修改以提高可靠性 >参考文献 > 1。 ACI委员会318,《钢筋混凝土建筑规范要求》,a美国混凝土研究所,密歇根州法明顿希尔斯,1989年和1995年。 > 2。 AASHTO,公路桥梁标准规范,美国国家公路和运输官员协会,华盛顿特区,1977年。 > 3。 > 4。交通运输部工程分部,安大略省高速公路桥梁设计规范,加拿大安大略省,多伦多,1993年。 Collins,MP和Mitchell,D。,href =“ http://dx.doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09011980.32.100” title =“预应力和非预应力混凝土的剪力和扭转设计梁,预应力和非预应力混凝土梁的剪力和扭转设计,a? PCI JOURNAL,第25卷,第5期,1980年9月至10月,第32-100页。 > 5。 Collins,M.P.和Mitchell,D.,《预应力混凝土结构》,Prentice Hall,Englewood Cliffs,NJ,1991年,76 tlpp。 6. AASHTO,《 LRFD公路桥梁设计规范》,美国国家公路和运输官员协会,华盛顿特区,1994年。 > 7。 Shahawy,M.,Robinson,B.和Batchelor,B.d.,a。预应力混凝土AASHTO II型大梁的抗剪强度研究,a。佛罗里达州塔拉哈西市交通局结构研究中心研究报告,1993年1月。 > 8。 Shahawy,M.,Issa,M.和Batchelor,B. deV。,href =“ http://dx.doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011992.84.96” title =“ a?全尺寸AASHTO预应力混凝土梁,是吗?” target =“ _ blank”> a?完整AASHTO预应力混凝土大梁的钢绞线长度,a?《 PCI Journal》,1992年5月6日,第3卷,第3期,第84-96页。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号