...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Safety in Surgery >Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical fixation of closed long bone fractures: a survey of 297 members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association
【24h】

Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical fixation of closed long bone fractures: a survey of 297 members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association

机译:闭合性长骨骨折的外科手术抗生素预防的当前实践:对整形外科创伤协会297名成员的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The risk of postoperative surgical site infection after long bone fracture fixation can be decreased with appropriate antibiotic use. However, there is no agreement on the superiority of a single- or multiple-dose perioperative regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis. The purpose of this study is to determine the following: 1) What are the current practice patterns of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in using perioperative antibiotics for closed long bone fractures? 2) What is the current knowledge of published antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines among orthopaedic trauma surgeons? 3) Are orthopaedic surgeons willing to change their current practices? Methods A questionnaire was distributed via email between September and December 2015 to 955 Orthopaedic Trauma Association members, of whom 297 (31%) responded. Results Most surgeons (96%) use cefazolin as first-line infection prophylaxis. Fifty-nine percent used a multiple-dose antibiotic regimen, 39% used a single-dose regimen, and 2% varied this decision according to patient factors. Thirty-six percent said they were unfamiliar with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines; only 30% were able to select the correct CDC recommendation from a multiple-choice list. However, 44% of surgeons said they followed CDC recommendations. Fifty-six percent answered that a single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis regimen was not inferior to a multiple-dose regimen. If a level-I study comparing a single preoperative dose versus multiple perioperative antibiotic dosing regimen for treatment of closed long bone fractures were published, most respondents (64%) said they would fully follow these guidelines, and 22% said they would partially change their practice to follow these guidelines. Conclusion There is heterogeneity in the use of single- versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical repair of closed long bone fractures. Many surgeons were unsure of current evidence-based recommendations regarding perioperative antibiotic use. Most respondents indicated they would be receptive to high-level evidence regarding the single- versus multiple-dose perioperative prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of closed long bone fractures.
机译:背景技术适当使用抗生素可降低长期骨折固定后术后手术部位感染的风险。但是,关于单剂量或多剂量围手术期抗生素预防方案的优越性尚无共识。本研究的目的是确定以下内容:1)骨科外科医生目前在围手术期使用抗生素治疗闭合性长骨骨折时的实践模式是什么? 2)整形外科医生中对已出版的抗生素预防指南的最新了解是什么? 3)整形外科医生是否愿意改变目前的做法?方法在2015年9月至2015年12月期间,通过电子邮件向955名骨伤科协会会员分发了问卷,其中297名(31%)回答。结果大多数外科医生(96%)将头孢唑林用作一线感染的预防措施。 59%的人使用了多剂量抗生素治疗方案,39%的患者使用了单剂量治疗方案,2%的患者根据患者因素改变了这一决定。 36%的人表示他们不熟悉疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的抗生素预防指南;只有30%的人能够从多项选择列表中选择正确的CDC建议。但是,有44%的外科医生表示他们遵循CDC的建议。 56%的人回答说单剂量抗生素预防方案并不逊于多剂量方案。如果发表一项比较术前单一剂量与围手术期多种抗生素剂量治疗闭合性长骨骨折的I级研究,则大多数受访者(64%)表示将完全遵循这些准则,而22%的受访者表示将部分改变他们的指导原则。练习遵循这些准则。结论单剂量或多剂量抗生素预防闭合性长骨骨折的手术修复存在异质性。许多外科医生不确定当前有关围手术期抗生素使用的循证建议。大多数受访者表示,对于围手术期闭合性长骨折的单剂量或多剂量围手术期预防性抗生素的使用,高水平的证据是可以接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号