首页> 外文期刊>Patient Safety in Surgery >Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
【24h】

Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties

机译:科罗拉多州对手术安全检查表的合规性欠佳:一项前瞻性观察研究揭示了外科专业之间的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Surgical safety checklists (SSCs) are designed to improve team communication and consistency in care, ultimately avoiding complications. In Colorado, hospitals reported that use of SSCs was standard practice, but a statewide survey indicated that SSC use was inconsistent. The purpose of this project was to directly observe the compliance with the SSC in Colorado hospitals, through direct observation of the perioperative checklist process. Methods Ten hospitals participated in a quality improvement initiative. Trained team members recorded compliance with each of the components of the SSC. Data analysis was performed using a chi-squared test or ANOVA, depending on the number of categorical variables, with p Results Ten hospitals representing statewide diversity submitted 854 observations (median 98, range 24–106). 83% of cases were elective, 13% urgent, and 4% emergent/trauma. There was significant variation across hospitals in: team introductions, cessation of activity, affirming correct procedure, assessing hypothermia risk, need for beta blocker, or VTE prophylaxis. Uniformly poor compliance was observed with respect to assessment of case duration, blood loss, anesthesiologists’ concerns, or display of essential imaging. Only 71% of observers reported active participation by physicians; 9% reported that “the majority did not pay attention” and 4% reported that the team was “just going through the motions”. There were significant differences among surgical specialty groups in the majority of the elements. Conclusion SSCs have been implemented by the vast majority of hospitals in our state; however, compliance with SSC completion in the operating room has wide variation and is generally suboptimal. Although this study was not designed to correlate SSC compliance with outcomes, there are concerns about the risk of a sentinel event or unanticipated complication resulting from poor preparation.
机译:背景手术安全检查表(SSC)旨在改善团队之间的沟通和护理一致性,最终避免并发症。在科罗拉多州,医院报告说,使用SSC是标准做法,但是一项全州范围的调查表明,使用SSC不一致。该项目的目的是通过直接观察围手术期检查清单过程来直接观察科罗拉多州医院对SSC的遵守情况。方法10家医院参加了质量改进计划。受过训练的团队成员记录了对SSC各个组成部分的遵守情况。数据分析是使用卡方检验或ANOVA进行的,具体取决于分类变量的数量,结果为p。结果十家代表州范围内差异的医院提交了854项观察结果(中位值98,范围24-106)。 83%的病例为择期,13%紧急和4%紧急/创伤。各医院之间存在显着差异:团队介绍,停止活动,确认正确的程序,评估体温过低的风险,是否需要β受体阻滞剂或预防VTE。在评估病例持续时间,失血量,麻醉师的疑虑或基本影像显示方面,观察到一致的依从性差。只有71%的观察者报告说医生积极参与。 9%的人报告说“大多数人没有注意”,而4%的人报告说该团队“只是在进行议案”。在大多数因素中,外科专业组之间存在显着差异。结论本州绝大多数医院已实施SSC。但是,在手术室中完成SSC的依从性差异很大,通常次优。尽管本研究并非旨在将SSC依从性与预后相关联,但仍存在因准备不足而导致前哨事件或意外并发症的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号