首页> 外文期刊>Patient Related Outcome Measures >A questionnaire-based audit to assess overall experience and convenience among patients using vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest?) for luteal phase support during IVF treatment
【24h】

A questionnaire-based audit to assess overall experience and convenience among patients using vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest?) for luteal phase support during IVF treatment

机译:基于问卷的审计,以评估在使用IVF治疗期间使用阴道孕酮片(Lutigest ?)进行黄体期支持的患者的总体经验和便利性

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this audit was to assess the overall experience and patient convenience of vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest?, marketed as Endometrin? in the USA) used for luteal phase support (LPS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Patients and methods: This questionnaire-based audit included responses from 100 patients undergoing IVF treatment at six IVF clinics in the UK from September 2015 to November 2016. Fourteen days after starting progesterone supplementation for LPS during their IVF treatment, patients rated overall experience and perceived convenience of the prescribed progesterone by completing a questionnaire. Results: Of the 100 patients included, 96 received vaginal progesterone tablets for LPS. Overall, 53.1% (51/96) indicated that the progesterone tablets were “very easy” to use; 42.7% (41/96) and 44.8% (43/96) found it “very convenient” or “neither convenient or inconvenient” to administer the tablet, respectively. Overall experience with using progesterone tablets was rated as “very comfortable” by 34.4% (33/96) and “neither comfortable or uncomfortable” by 56.3% (54/96) of patients. The applicator was used by 93.8% (90/96) of patients to administer the tablet, and 86.5% (83/96) indicated that the applicator was easy to clean for repeated use. A total of 33 patients had a previous IVF cycle during which they were prescribed vaginal progesterone pessaries for LPS. Compared with progesterone pessaries, the majority found treatment with progesterone tablets to be more comfortable (60.6%; 20/33) and more convenient (57.6%; 19/33) and indicated that the progesterone tablet was their preferred progesterone formulation for LPS (60.6%; 20/33). Conclusion: These findings offer insights into real-world patient experiences with the progesterone vaginal tablet formulation. The results suggest overall patient convenience, ease, and comfort with using progesterone vaginal tablets for LPS. The majority of patients found progesterone vaginal tablets more convenient and comfortable to use compared with progesterone pessaries.
机译:目的:本次审核的目的是评估用于黄体期的阴道孕酮片(在美国以Endometrin ?出售的Lutigest ?)的整体经验和患者便利性体外受精(IVF)治疗期间的支持(LPS)。患者和方法:基于问卷的审计包括从2015年9月至2016年11月在英国的6个IVF诊所接受100%IVF治疗的患者的回答。在进行IVF治疗期间开始补充黄体酮补充LPS后的14天,患者对总体经历和感觉进行了评估填写问卷可方便使用规定的孕酮。结果:在包括的100例患者中,有96例接受了LPS阴道孕酮片。总体而言,有53.1%(51/96)表示孕酮片“非常容易”使用。 42.7%(41/96)和44.8%(43/96)分别认为服用该片剂“非常方便”或“既不方便也很不方便”。服用黄体酮片的总体经验被评为34.4%(33/96)为“非常舒适”,被评估为56.3%(54/96)为“不舒适或不舒适”。 93.8%(90/96)的患者使用了该涂抹器以服用该片剂,而86.5%(83/96)的患者表示该涂抹器易于清洗以重复使用。共有33位患者在先前的IVF周期中接受了LPS阴道黄体酮子宫托治疗。与黄体酮子宫托相比,大多数人发现黄体酮片治疗更舒适(60.6%; 20/33)和更方便(57.6%; 19/33),并指出黄体酮片是他们首选的LPS黄体酮制剂(60.6)。 %; 20/33)。结论:这些发现为了解黄体酮阴道片制剂在现实世界中的患者体验提供了见识。结果表明使用黄体酮阴道片治疗LPS总体上为患者带来了便利,轻松和舒适。与黄体酮子宫托相比,大多数患者发现黄体酮阴道片使用起来更方便,更舒适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号