...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
【24h】

Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease

机译:患者组织杂志和基于互联网的梅尼埃病患者同伴支持向患者报告的收益

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To facilitate self-help, the Finnish Ménière’s Federation (FMF) provides various kinds of support to persons with Ménière’s disease (MD), which includes patient magazines?(PM) and Internet-based peer support (iPS). The current study aimed to evaluate the benefits reported by MD patients in terms of PM and iPS. Method: The study used a cross-sectional survey design with a mixture of structured and open-ended questions administered online. A sample of 185 patients from the FMF membership database provided complete data. Results: Ninety-two percent of the respondents rated PM as useful, or very useful. The main benefits of PM included: information on the disease and complaints, information about elements of peer support program, patient’s experience with useful positive case studies, relevant news on MD, and information of activity of the FMF. Of the 185 persons, 68 reported that they did not have a need for peer support as their disease was either in silent phase or did not cause any annoyance. The main reasons for nonuse were: mild disease, personal reasons, and problems in using. Regarding the benefits of iPS, 75% of recent and 64% of chronic MD patients said that they would benefit from such a program. The main benefits of iPS included: reliable information on the disease and its management, peer support useful for coping with the disease, information about managing MD symptoms, information about managing attitude, and information about therapy. Moreover, the study identified different groups of individuals, which included: nonusers of support from patient organizations, those who used the support but did not feel they benefited, and those who used and also benefited from such programs. Conclusion: The current study results provide some information about the preferences of MD patients regarding different forms of support and could certainly prove helpful while developing wider support strategies.
机译:目标:为了促进自助,芬兰梅尼埃联合会(FMF)为梅尼埃病(MD)的患者提供各种支持,其中包括患者杂志(PM)和基于Internet的同伴支持(iPS)。当前的研究旨在评估MD患者在PM和iPS方面报告的益处。方法:该研究使用横断面调查设计,其中包含在线管理的结构化和开放式问题的混合物。来自FMF成员数据库的185名患者的样本提供了完整的数据。结果:92%的受访者将PM评为有用或非常有用。 PM的主要好处包括:有关疾病和主诉的信息,有关同伴支持计划的内容的信息,患者对有益的积极案例研究的经验,有关MD的新闻以及FMF的活动信息。在这185人中,有68人报告说他们不需要病患的支持,因为他们的疾病处于沉默期或没有引起任何烦恼。不使用的主要原因是:轻度疾病,个人原因和使用问题。关于iPS的益处,最近有75%的慢性MD患者和64%的慢性MD患者表示他们将从这种计划中受益。 iPS的主要好处包括:有关疾病及其治疗的可靠信息,对付疾病有用的同伴支持,有关管理MD症状的信息,有关管理态度的信息以及有关治疗的信息。此外,该研究还确定了不同的个人群体,其中包括:非患者组织的支持者,使用了支持但认为自己没有受益的人以及使用过此类程序并从中受益的人。结论:当前的研究结果提供了一些有关MD患者偏爱不同形式支持的信息,并且在开发更广泛的支持策略时肯定会有所帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号