...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan Heart Journal >COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY FOR ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT DIABETES MELLITUS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY FOR ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT DIABETES MELLITUS

机译:糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者行ST段抬高型心肌梗死的溶栓治疗的疗效和安全性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: This study compared the efficacy and safety of streptokinase as thrombolytic agent for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Methodology: This prospective interventional study was carried out in the department of Cardiology, Postgraduate Medical Institute Govt. Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. A total of 444 patients admitted to coronary care unit with STEMI and eligible for thrombolytic therapy (no contraindications per AHA/ACC guidelines) were studied from December 2009 to December 2010. Among these half of patients were diabetic while rests were non-diabetic. Streptokinase was administered to all patients. Resolution (reduction) of elevated ST segment was evaluated after 90 min of streptokinase administration. Comlications of streptokinase infusion including hypotension, shock and hemorrhage was noted. Results: Failed reperfusion (<30% ST resolution) was significantly higher in diabetic as compared to non-diabetic patients (21.6% vs. 9.5%; p<0.0003) while successful reperfusion (≥70% ST-resolution) was significantly higher in non-diabetic than diabetic patients (66.7% vs. 49.1%; p<0.0001). Complication rates between the two groups were statistically similar. Hypotension occurred in 45 (20.3%) and 51 (23%); p=0.458 patients in non-diabetic and diabetic group respectively while shock occurred in 10 (4.5%) and 13 (5.9%); p= 0.506 and hemorrhagic manifestations in 13 (5.9%) and 10 (4.5%); p=0.294 patients respectively. Conclusion: The outcome of thrombolytic therapy is adversely affected by Diabetes mellitus in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Secondly the risk of hazards associated with thrombolytic therapy is same in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
机译:目的:本研究比较了链激酶作为溶栓剂治疗糖尿病合并和非糖尿病合并ST段抬高型心肌梗塞(STEMI)的有效性和安全性。方法:这项前瞻性干预研究在研究生医学研究所政府心脏病学系进行。雷丁夫人医院白沙瓦。 2009年12月至2010年12月,共研究了444例入院STEMI并接受溶栓治疗(无AHA / ACC指南禁忌症)的患者。其中一半为糖尿病患者,其余为非糖尿病患者。所有患者均服用链激酶。在施用链激酶90分钟后评估ST段抬高的分辨率(降低)。注意到输注链激酶的并发症包括低血压,休克和出血。结果:与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者失败的再灌注(<30%ST分辨率)显着更高(21.6%比9.5%; p <0.0003),而成功的再灌注(≥70%ST分辨率)显着更高。非糖尿病患者高于糖尿病患者(66.7%vs. 49.1%; p <0.0001)。两组之间的并发症发生率在统计学上相似。低血压发生在45(20.3%)和51(23%);非糖尿病组和糖尿病组分别为p = 0.458,而休克发生率分别为10(4.5%)和13(5.9%)。 p = 0.506,有出血表现的有13(5.9%)和10(4.5%); p = 0.294例患者。结论:ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的糖尿病对溶栓治疗的结果有不利影响。其次,在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中,与溶栓治疗相关的危险风险相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号