首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Determination of Key Risk Supervision Areas around River-Type Water Sources Affected by Multiple Risk Sources: A Case Study of Water Sources along the Yangtze’s Nanjing Section
【24h】

Determination of Key Risk Supervision Areas around River-Type Water Sources Affected by Multiple Risk Sources: A Case Study of Water Sources along the Yangtze’s Nanjing Section

机译:确定受多种风险源影响的河流型水源周围的关键风险监管区域:以长江南京段沿线水源为例

获取原文
       

摘要

To provide a reference for risk management of water sources, this study screens the key risk supervision areas around river-type water sources (hereinafter referred to as the water sources) threatened by multiple fixed risk sources (the risk sources), and establishes a comprehensive methodological system. Specifically, it comprises: (1) method of partitioning risk source concentrated sub-regions for screening water source perimeter key risk supervision areas; (2) approach of determining sub-regional risk indexes (SrRI, which characterizes the scale of sub-regional risks) considering factors like risk distribution intensity within sub-regions, risk indexes of risk sources (RIRS, characterizing the risk scale of risk sources) and the number of risk sources; and (3) method of calculating sub-region’s risk threats to the water sources (SrTWS) which considers the positional relationship between water sources and sub-regions as well as SrRI, and the criteria for determining key supervision sub-regions. Favorable effects are achieved by applying this methodological system in determining water source perimeter sub-regions distributed along the Yangtze’s Nanjing section. Results revealed that for water sources, the key sub-regions needing supervision were SD16 , SD06 , SD21 , SD26 , SD15 , SD03 , SD02 , SD32 , SD10 , SD11 , SD14 , SD05 , SD27 , etc., in the order of criticality. The sub-region with the greatest risk threats on the water sources was SD16 , which was located in the middle reaches of Yangtze River. In general, sub-regions along the upper Yangtze reaches had greater threats to water sources than the lower reach sub-regions other than SD26 and SD21 . Upstream water sources were less subject to the threats of sub-regions than the downstream sources other than NJ09B and NJ03.
机译:为对水源风险管理提供参考,本研究筛选了受到多种固定风险源(风险源)威胁的河流型水源(以下简称水源)周围的关键风险监管区域,并建立了综合方法体系。具体地,包括:(1)划分风险源集中分区的方法,以筛选水源周界重点风险监管区域。 (2)确定次区域风险指数的方法(SrRI,表征次区域风险的规模),考虑诸如次区域内的风险分布强度,风险源的风险指数(RIRS,表征风险源的风险规模)等因素)以及风险来源的数量; (3)计算次区域对水源的威胁的方法(SrTWS),该方法考虑了水源与次区域之间的位置关系以及SrRI,以及确定主要监管子区域的标准。通过应用此方法系统确定沿长江南京段分布的水源周边子区域,可获得良好的效果。结果表明,对于水源,需要监测的关键子区域依次为SD16,SD06,SD21,SD26,SD15,SD03,SD02,SD32,SD10,SD11,SD14,SD05,SD27等。水源受到最大威胁的分区是SD16,它位于长江中游。总体来说,长江上游地区比SD26和SD21以外的下游地区对水源的威胁更大。除NJ09B和NJ03外,上游水源受到的威胁要小于下游水源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号