...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Science >Continuous Gas Outflow Is More Effective Than Carbon Filters to Evacuate Smoke in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Continuous Gas Outflow Is More Effective Than Carbon Filters to Evacuate Smoke in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections: A Comparative Study

机译:持续的气体流出比碳过滤器更有效地疏散腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的烟雾:一项比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: Carbon filters and expensive evacuation machines are available to evacuate surgical smoke in long-lasting laparoscopic operations and achieve good visibility and patient’s safety. Methods: This study was aimed to determine which of two methods for laparoscopic smoke evacuation is most effective getting the best visibility. 20 patients submitted to elective laparoscopic colorectal resections were allocated to be operated using, either a carbon filter (Group A) or a home-made tubing with a continuous suction (Group B) connected through one of the ports to the hospital vacuum system: both methods were regulated with a roller clamp to increase smoke evacuation in order to obtain good visibility. A mono-polar hook and the LigasureV 5-mm vessel-sealing device were used. Groups were comparable for demographic characteristics, surgical techniques, and malignancy. Mann-Whitney and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistics. Results: Morbidity was 10%. There was no mortality, and there was no difference between Group A and B according to complications (p = 1.00), hospital stay (p = 0.23), duration of the operation (p = 0.79) and total consumption of CO2 (p = 0.36). However, the number of times that the clamp had to be released (Group A: 3.4 + 1 vs Group B: 1.5 + 1) (p = 0.006) and that a port had to be opened freely to quickly evacuate dense smoke (Group A: 0.9 + 0.7 vs Group B: 0) (p = 0.002) was very significantly increased in Group A as compared to Group B. Mean follow-up was 60 months and no port site metastases that could be a consequence of “chimney effect” or wound recurrence have been detected. Conclusions: The surgeon’s subjective impression that carbon filters are less effective for smoke evacuation than continuous outflow of gas through a port connected to the hospital vacuum source was confirmed. This simple method is advised for long-lasting laparoscopic procedures to improve visibility throughout the procedure.
机译:背景:碳过滤器和昂贵的疏散机可用于在长期腹腔镜手术中排空手术烟雾,并获得良好的视野和患者安全。方法:本研究旨在确定腹腔镜排烟的两种方法中哪种方法最有效,以获得最佳可见度。接受选择性腹腔镜大肠切除术的20名患者被分配为使用碳过滤器(A组)或通过连续抽吸(B组)通过一个端口连接到医院真空系统的自制管道进行手术:为了获得良好的可见度,用滚轮钳调节各种方法以增加排烟。使用了单极挂钩和5毫米的LigasureV容器密封装置。各组在人口统计学特征,手术技术和恶性肿瘤方面具有可比性。曼恩·惠特尼和费舍尔的精确检验用于统计。结果:发病率为10%。没有死亡率,A组和B组在并发症(p = 1.00),住院时间(p = 0.23),手术时间(p = 0.79)和二氧化碳总消耗量(p = 0.36)之间没有差异。 )。但是,必须释放夹钳的次数(A组:3.4 + 1 vs B组:1.5 + 1)(p = 0.006)并且必须自由打开端口以快速排出浓烟(A组) :B组为0.9 + 0.7,B组为0)(p = 0.002)与B组相比显着增加。平均随访时间为60个月,没有因“烟囱效应”导致的港口现场转移或发现伤口复发。结论:证实了外科医生的主观印象,即与通过医院真空源连接的端口连续不断地流出气体相比,碳过滤器对排烟效果差。建议使用这种简单方法进行长期腹腔镜手术,以提高整个手术过程的可见度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号