...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Co-Benefits of Household Waste Recycling for Local Community’s Sustainable Waste Management in Thailand
【24h】

Co-Benefits of Household Waste Recycling for Local Community’s Sustainable Waste Management in Thailand

机译:家庭废物循环利用对泰国当地社区可持续废物管理的共同好处

获取原文
           

摘要

The study aimed to evaluate co-benefits in term of GHG reduction, and avoided landfill costs by implementing a community-based management (CBM) program for municipal solid waste (MSW). Two towns of peri-urban settlement in Thailand were investigated in case studies to compare eco-performance between the towns with and without implementation of the CBM program. MSW mass flows together with MSW utilization records were analyzed based on data in year 2013. Climate co-benefits from waste utilization activities were examined. Results from the study indicated that waste banks in the CBM program can effectively divert most of recyclables from entering landfills. The performance of “waste bank—recyclable recovery program” recycling rate from the case study with CBM is 172.20 kg per member per year, which is about 926% higher than average CBMs with MSW recycling in Thailand, and the success of CBM can be attributed to its curbside pickup service and fair-pricing of recyclables. The study also found that if the town decided to divert wastes from landfilling, carbon intensity of the MSW system would be 0.47 tons of CO2-eq per ton of collected MSW. The landfilling cost would be approximately 7.41 USD per ton of MSW as landfilling cost. With CBM programs, current MSW reutilization rate has achieved 9.68% of generated waste, and 16.80% of GHG emission has been avoided, along with a reduction in landfill costs of 11.57%. Two scenarios of waste utilization in Thailand were explored and compared, in terms of which scenarios yielded the highest co-benefits. The study demonstrates that by allowing local mechanism and community involvement programs to develop with operational waste banks, the efficiency of collecting recycling wastes increased. A similar system can be applied to other communities in other countries.
机译:该研究旨在评估减少温室气体的共同效益,并通过实施针对城市固体废物(MSW)的社区管理(CBM)计划来避免垃圾填埋成本。在案例研究中,对泰国的两个城市郊区定居镇进行了调查,以比较实施和未实施CBM计划的城镇之间的生态绩效。根据2013年的数据分析了MSW的质量流量以及MSW的利用记录。检查了废物利用活动产生的气候共同效益。研究结果表明,煤层气项目中的废物库可以有效地将大多数可回收利用物转移到填埋场。煤层气案例研究得出的“废物库-可回收利用计划”回收率是每位成员每年172.20千克,这比泰国MSW回收的平均煤层气高926%,这可以归因于煤层气的成功其路边的取货服务和可回收物品的公平定价。研究还发现,如果该镇决定将垃圾从掩埋场转移出去,则城市固体垃圾系统的碳强度将为每吨收集的城市固体垃圾0.47吨CO 2 eq。垃圾填埋的成本约为每吨城市固体废弃物7.41美元。通过建立煤层气计划,目前的城市固体废弃物再利用率达到了产生废弃物的9.68%,避免了16.80%的温室气体排放,同时降低了垃圾填埋场的成本11.5%。探索并比较了泰国废物利用的两种方案,即每种方案产生的最大协同效益。研究表明,通过允许地方机制和社区参与计划与可操作的废物库一起发展,收集回收废物的效率得以提高。可以将类似的系统应用于其他国家的其他社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号