首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Assessing the Impact of Land Use Policy on Urban-Rural Sustainability Using the FoPIA Approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
【24h】

Assessing the Impact of Land Use Policy on Urban-Rural Sustainability Using the FoPIA Approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

机译:使用FoPIA方法评估印度尼西亚日惹土地使用政策对城乡可持续性的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper presents the results of a sustainability impact assessment (SIA) of policy induced land use changes in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The regional problems include rapid expansions of urban areas, due to high population pressure, and the conversion of paddy fields and forests into settlements. The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of two land use policies on social, economic, and environmental Land Use Functions (LUFs) in Yogyakarta. The following scenarios were developed for the SIA: a forest protection scenario (S1), a paddy field conservation scenario (S2), and a counterfactual (no policy) scenario of ‘Business As Usual’ (BAU). The Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA) was applied to conduct an expert-based impact assessment. For the specification of the regional sustainability context, a set of nine key LUFs and associated indicators were developed, including three social, three economic, and three environmental sustainability criteria. The resulting scenario impacts of the assessment differed considerably, with positive impacts of the S1 and S2 scenarios on seven of nine LUFs, and negative impacts of the BAU scenario on six LUFs. The perception of the FoPIA method by the regional stakeholders was positive. We conclude that this method contributes toward an enhanced regional understanding of policy effects and sustainability, particularly in data-poor environments.
机译:本文介绍了印度尼西亚日惹政策引起的土地利用变化的可持续发展影响评估(SIA)的结果。区域问题包括由于人口压力高造成的城市地区迅速扩张,以及稻田和森林转变为定居点。这项研究的目的是评估日惹的两种土地使用政策对社会,经济和环境土地使用功能(LUF)的影响。针对SIA开发了以下方案:森林保护方案(S1),稻田保护方案(S2)和反事实(无政策)方案为“照常营业”(BAU)。参与式影响评估框架(FoPIA)被用于进行基于专家的影响评估。为了规范区域可持续性背景,制定了一套九个关键的土地利用价值和相关指标,包括三个社会,三个经济和三个环境可持续性标准。评估结果对情景的影响差异很大,S1和S2情景对9个LUF的其中7个产生积极影响,而BAU情景对6个LUF的负面影响。区域利益相关者对FoPIA方法的看法是积极的。我们得出的结论是,这种方法有助于增强区域对政策效果和可持续性的理解,尤其是在数据匮乏的环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号