首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Seeing the People’s Republic of China through the Eyes of Montesquieu: Why Sino-European Collaboration on Eco City Development Suffers from European Misinterpretations of “Good Governance”
【24h】

Seeing the People’s Republic of China through the Eyes of Montesquieu: Why Sino-European Collaboration on Eco City Development Suffers from European Misinterpretations of “Good Governance”

机译:通过孟德斯鸠的眼光看中华人民共和国:为什么中欧在生态城市发展方面的合作会遭受欧洲对“善治”的误解

获取原文
       

摘要

China faces a number of impressive challenges in dealing with climate change: rising energy use, growing emission levels of greenhouse gases, dangerous levels of air pollution over cities and low resilience against flood and drought. Sustainable urbanization has been adopted as a keyword in handling these challenges. The Chinese central government has undertaken a variety of measures, including the launch of large Sino-European programs to learn from ‘developed nations’. In the wake of these partnerships, a great variety of cross-national and cross-city agreements were signed. Sino-European cooperation does not often run as smoothly as initially hoped because of diverging interests, cultural misunderstandings and practical limitations. In the background, a mismatch in normative conceptions Chinese and European participants have of ‘good governance’ plays a role. In this contribution, insights taken from Montesquieu’s ‘The Spirit of Laws’ regarding checks and balances and trias politica (updated to ‘sextas politica’ for the 21st century) are used to comprehend how the exertion of power is distributed and expected to be distributed differently in Chinese than in European administrative traditions. The article will end with conclusions on how European misconceptions of Chinese governance complicate Sino-European collaboration in sustainable urbanization policies.
机译:中国在应对气候变化方面面临着许多令人瞩目的挑战:能源使用量的增加,温室气体排放水平的提高,城市空气污染的危险水平以及对洪水和干旱的抵抗力低下。可持续城市化已被用作应对这些挑战的关键词。中国中央政府已采取各种措施,包括启动大型中欧计划以向“发达国家”学习。在这些伙伴关系之后,签署了各种各样的跨国和跨城市协议。由于利益分歧,文化误解和实际限制,中欧合作往往没有最初希望的顺利。在这种背景下,中国和欧洲参与者对“善治”的规范性观念不匹配。在此贡献中,从孟德斯鸠的“法律精神”中获得了关于制衡和政治三方性的见解(在21世纪更新为“政治六十”),从而理解了权力的分配方式和预期的分配方式用中文比用欧洲的行政传统。本文将以欧洲人对中国治理的错误观念如何使中欧在可持续城市化政策方面的合作复杂化为结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号