首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Conflict over Mining in Rural China: A Comprehensive Survey of Intentions and Strategies for Environmental Activism
【24h】

Conflict over Mining in Rural China: A Comprehensive Survey of Intentions and Strategies for Environmental Activism

机译:中国农村的采矿冲突:环境行动的意图和策略的综合调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Mining causes severe adverse effects such as pollution and forced resettlement. Accordingly, it has prompted conflicts that are also evident in China. Our study assesses whether and how rural residents’ engage in environmental activism (EA) against mining. This is achieved by constructing a model of EA strategies, coupled to variables that examine respondents’ intentions. The model uses data from a survey ( n = 352) covering 37 villages spread over 5 provinces and 1 provincial-level municipality. The model is based on a refinement of the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Various findings are reported: (1) a majority of respondents (77%) believes that pollution in the mining areas is serious; (2) there is pessimism about the effects of EA with 41% believing it does not improve the environment, and less than one-fifth feeling the government supports EA, contradictorily; (3) well over half has engaged in one or more forms of EA, while (4) dominant EA strategies consist of complaining to local government or village authorities (both over 40%), or open protest (opted for by over 17%); (5) economic dependency and gender affect the intention for EA, as those employed in mining and women are less inclined to participate. Whereas studies pointed to “inclined abstainers” or the “silent majority”, this study ascertains that—with regard to mining—rural residents are not silent. We posit that a threshold of environmental endurance might have been reached. In this context, policymakers need to tackle the adverse effects of mining, as it is likely to generate more violent confrontations that ultimately pose risks to political credibility and social stability.
机译:采矿会造成严重的不利影响,例如污染和重新安置。因此,它引发了在中国也很明显的冲突。我们的研究评估了农村居民是否以及如何参与反对采矿的环境行动主义(EA)。这是通过构建EA策略模型并结合检查受访者意图的变量来实现的。该模型使用的调查数据(n = 352)覆盖了5个省和1个省级市的37个村庄。该模型基于计划行为理论(TPB)的完善。报告了各种发现:(1)大多数受访者(77%)认为矿区的污染很严重; (2)对EA的效果感到悲观,有41%的人认为EA不能改善​​环境,而认为政府支持EA的不到五分之一; (3)超过一半的人参与了一种或多种形式的EA,而(4)主导的EA策略包括向地方政府或乡村当局投诉(均超过40%)或公开抗议(超过17%的人选择) ; (5)经济依赖性和性别会影响对EA的意图,因为从事采矿业的人和妇女不太愿意参与。尽管研究指向“倾向于弃权的人”或“沉默的多数”,但这项研究确定了(就采矿而言)农村居民并不沉默。我们假设可能已达到环境承受力的阈值。在这种情况下,决策者需要解决采矿业的不利影响,因为采矿业可能会产生更多暴力冲突,最终对政治信誉和社会稳定构成风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号