首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Neurology International >Lower complication and reoperation rates for laminectomy rather than MI TLIF/other fusions for degenerative lumbar disease/spondylolisthesis: A review
【24h】

Lower complication and reoperation rates for laminectomy rather than MI TLIF/other fusions for degenerative lumbar disease/spondylolisthesis: A review

机译:椎板切除术比MI TLIF /其他融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病/腰椎滑脱的并发症和再手术率更低:综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Utilizing the spine literature, we compared the complication and reoperation rates for laminectomy alone vs. instrumented fusions including minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the surgical management of multilevel degenerative lumbar disease with/without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Methods: Epstein compared complication and reoperation rates over 2 years for 137 patients undergoing laminectomy alone undergoing 2-3 level (58 patients) and 4-6 level (79 patients) Procedures for lumbar stenosis with/without DS. Results showed no new postoperative neurological deficits, no infections, no surgery for adjacent segment disease (ASD), 4 patients (2.9%) who developed intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas, no readmissions, and just 1 reopereation for a (postoperative day 7). These rates were compared to other literature for lumbar laminectomies vs. fusions (e.g. particularly MI TLIF) addressing pathology comparable to that listed above. Results: Some studies in the literature revealed an average 4.8% complication rate for laminectomy alone vs. 8.3% for decompressions/fusion; at 5 postoperative years, reoperation rates were 10.6% vs. 18.4%, respectively. Specifically, the MI TLIF literature complication rates ranged from 7.7% to 23.0% and included up to an 8.3% incidence of wound infections, 6.1% durotomies, 9.7% permanent neurological deficits, and 20.2% incidence of new sensory deficits. Reoperation rates (1.6–6%) for MI TLIF addressed instrumentation failure (2.3%), cage migration (1.26–2.4%), cage extrusions (0.8%), and misplaced screws (1.6%). The learning curve (e.g. number of cases required by a surgeon to become proficient) for MI TLIF was the first 33-44 cases. Furthermore, hospital costs for lumbar fusions were 2.6 fold greater than those for laminectomy alone, with overall neurosurgeon reimbursement quoted in one study as high as $142,075 per year. Conclusions: The spinal literature revealed lower complication and reoperation rates for lumbar laminectomy alone vs. higher rates for instrumented fusion, including MI TLIF, for degenerative lumbar disease with/without DS.
机译:背景:利用脊柱文献,我们比较了单独椎板切除术与包括微创经孔椎间椎体间融合术(TLIF)在内的器械融合术在多级退行性腰椎滑脱合并/不行退行性腰椎滑脱症(DS)的手术管理中的并发症和再手术率)。方法:Epstein比较了137例仅接受椎板切除术的患者(在2-3例(58例)和4-6例(79例)中进行的有/不具有DS的腰椎狭窄手术)在2年内的并发症和再次手术率。结果显示,术后无新的神经功能缺损,无感染,无需进行邻近节段性疾病(ASD)手术,4例(2.9%)术中出现脑脊液(CSF)瘘管,无再次入院,仅1例再次手术(术后7天) )。将这些比率与其他文献进行了腰椎椎间孔切开术与融合术(例如MI TLIF)的病理学比较,这些病理学可与以上列出的相媲美。结果:文献中的一些研究表明,仅椎板切除术的平均并发症发生率为4.8%,而减压/融合术的平均并发症发生率为8.3%。术后5年的再手术率分别为10.6%和18.4%。具体而言,MI TLIF文献的并发症发生率在7.7%至23.0%之间,包括高达8.3%的伤口感染发生率,6.1%的切开术,9.7%的永久神经功能缺损和20.2%的新感觉缺损发生率。 MI TLIF的再手术率(1.6–6%)解决了仪器故障(2.3%),保持架移动(1.26-–2.4%),保持架挤压(0.8%)和螺钉放错(1.6%)的问题。 MI TLIF的学习曲线(例如,外科医生需要熟练的病例数)是前33-44例。此外,腰椎融合术的医院费用比仅椎板切除术的费用高2.6倍,其中一项研究指出,神经外科医生的整体报销每年高达142,075美元。结论:脊柱文献显示,单独行腰椎椎板切除术的并发症和再手术率较低,而对于伴有/不伴有DS的退行性腰椎疾病,器械融合术(包括MI TLIF)的发生率较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号