...
首页> 外文期刊>Stroke Research and Treatment >A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia
【24h】

A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia

机译:低温疗法治疗心脏骤停患者的冷却技术比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. We sought to compare the performance of endovascular cooling to conventional surface cooling after cardiac arrest.Methods. Patients in coma following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were cooled with an endovascular cooling catheter or with ice bags and cold-water-circulating cooling blankets to a target temperature of 32.0–34.0∘C for 24 hours. Performance of cooling techniques was compared by (1) number of hourly recordings in target temperature range, (2) time elapsed from the written order to initiate cooling and target temperature, and (3) adverse events during the first week.Results. Median time in target temperature range was 19 hours (interquartile range (IQR), 16–20) in the endovascular groupversus. 10 hours (IQR, 7–15) in the surface group (P=.001). Median time to target temperature was 4 (IQR, 2.8–6.2) and 4.5 (IQR, 3–6.5) hours, respectively (P=.67). Adverse events were similar.Conclusion. Endovascular cooling maintains target temperatures better than conventional surface cooling.
机译:介绍。我们试图比较心脏骤停后血管内冷却与常规表面冷却的性能。心肺复苏后昏迷的患者用血管内冷却导管或冰袋和冷水循环冷却毯冷却至目标温度32.0–34.0∘C,持续24小时。通过(1)在目标温度范围内每小时记录的次数,(2)从书面命令开始启动冷却和目标温度所经过的时间以及(3)第一周的不良事件来比较冷却技术的性能。血管内群在目标温度范围内的中位时间为19小时(四分位间距(IQR),16-20)。表面组(P = .001)10小时(IQR,7-15)。达到目标温度的中位时间分别为4(IQR,2.8–6.2)和4.5(IQR,3–6.5)小时(P = .67)。不良事件相似。结论。血管内冷却比常规表面冷却能更好地保持目标温度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号