首页> 外文期刊>Revista chilena de historia natural / >A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
【24h】

A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units

机译:确定生物多样性管理单位的基于模块的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundTaxon- and/or ecosystem-based definitions of management units typically focus on conspicuous species and physical habitat limits; these definitions implicitly assume that these classification systems are related to the mechanisms that determine biodiversity persistence. However, ecological theory shows that this assumption may not be supported. Herein, we introduce the use of modularity analysis for objectively identifying management units and topological roles that land cover type plays on species movement through the landscape. MethodsAs a case study, we used a coastal system in Uruguay, with 28 land cover types and five taxa (from plants to mammals). A modularity-based approach was used to identify subsets of habitats with biotic affinity, termed modules, across the different taxonomic groups. Modularity detects the tendency of some land cover types to have a higher probability of the mutual interchange of individuals than other land cover types. Based on this approach, pairs of habitats that co-occur in the same module across taxa were considered in the same biodiversity management units (BMU). In addition, the topological role of each habitat was determined based on the occurrence of species through the landscape. ResultsOur approach determined three management units that combine land cover types usually considered independent, but instead are interrelated by an occurrence-based ecological network as proxies of the potential flow of individual and land use. For each selected taxon, the specific topological role of each habitat was determined. ConclusionsThis approach provides an objective way of delineating spatial units for conservation assessment. We showed that land cover types within these spatial units could be identified as refuges for specific types of biodiversity, sources of propagules for neighboring or overall landscapes, or stepping-stones connecting sub-regions. The preservation of these topological roles might help maintain the mechanisms that drive biodiversity in the system. Interestingly, the role of land cover type was strongly contingent on the taxa being considered. The method is comprehensible, applicable to policy and decision-makers, and well-connected with ecological theory. Moreover, this approach complements existing methods, introduces novel quantitative uses of available information, determines criteria for land cover classification and identifies management units that are not evident through other approaches.
机译:背景:基于税收和/或基于生态系统的管理单位定义通常着眼于明显的物种和自然栖息地限制;这些定义隐含地假设这些分类系统与确定生物多样性持久性的机制有关。但是,生态学理论表明可能不支持该假设。在此,我们介绍了使用模块化分析来客观地识别土地覆盖类型对物种在景观中移动的管理单位和拓扑角色的作用。方法作为案例研究,我们在乌拉圭使用了一个沿海系统,该系统具有28种土地覆盖类型和5种分类单元(从植物到哺乳动物)。基于模块的方法用于识别不同分类组中具有生物亲和力的生境子集,称为模块。模块化检测某些土地覆被类型比其他土地覆被类型具有更高的个体相互互换性的趋势。基于这种方法,在同一生物多样性管理单位(BMU)中考虑了跨同一类群在同一模块中共生的成对生境。此外,每个栖息地的拓扑作用是根据景观中物种的发生情况确定的。结果我们的方法确定了三个管理单元,这些管理单元结合了通常被认为是独立的土地覆盖类型,但又通过基于事件的生态网络相互联系,作为个体和土地利用潜力流的代理。对于每个选定的分类单元,确定每个栖息地的特定拓扑角色。结论该方法为划定保护评估的空间单位提供了一种客观的方法。我们表明,这些空间单位内的土地覆盖类型可以识别为特定类型的生物多样性的避难所,邻近或整体景观的繁殖源或连接各子区域的垫脚石。保留这些拓扑角色可能有助于维持驱动系统中生物多样性的机制。有趣的是,土地覆盖类型的作用在很大程度上取决于所考虑的生物分类。该方法易于理解,适用于政策制定者和决策者,并且与生态理论紧密相关。此外,这种方法是对现有方法的补充,引入了对可用信息的新颖定量使用方法,确定了土地覆被分类的标准,并确定了其他方法不明显的管理单位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号