首页> 外文期刊>Southeastern Librarian >Online Cataloging Tools versus Print Cataloging Tools
【24h】

Online Cataloging Tools versus Print Cataloging Tools

机译:在线编目工具与打印编目工具

获取原文
           

摘要

>In the Bibliographic Services Department of The University of Southern Mississippi’s Libraries, the department not only maintains up-to-date print cataloging tools, but also subscribes to most of the online cataloging tools. The five catalogers in our department have different preferences in choosing the online or print versions when cataloging: one uses only print, one uses only online when possible, and the rest use both as needed. It appears that migrating totally from the print to online cataloging tools is not a preferred process for many of our catalogers, even though the benefits of using the online tools are substantial in saving time, accuracy, and uniformity. The authors’ experience with colleagues raised questions about what prompts some catalogers to prefer online to print and vice versa at libraries in the southeast region of the United States.
机译:>在南密西西比州大学图书馆书目服务部门,该部门不仅维护最新的印刷目录工具,而且还订阅了大多数在线目录工具。我们部门的五名编目人员在编目时选择联机或打印版本时有不同的偏好:一种只使用打印,一种在可能的情况下仅在线使用,其余根据需要使用两种。尽管从使用打印工具到节省大量时间,准确性和统一性的好处是可观的,但从打印工具完全迁移到在线分类工具并不是我们许多编目人员的首选过程。作者与同事的经验提出了一个问题,这些问题促使某些编目人员倾向于在美国东南部地区的图书馆进行在线印刷,反之亦然。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号