首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Psychiatry >Talking past each other: Conceptual confusion in ‘culture’ and ‘psychopathology’
【24h】

Talking past each other: Conceptual confusion in ‘culture’ and ‘psychopathology’

机译:互相交谈:“文化”和“精神病理学”中的概念混淆

获取原文
       

摘要

This article offers a commentary on Hassim and Wagner’s article, Considering the cultural context in psychopathology formulations, published in this issue of the South African Journal of Psychiatry (http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAJP.400). It clarifies aspects of the concepts of culture and psychopathology. A distinction is drawn between the content of culture and the demarcation of cultures. The former refers to socially acquired meanings and significances that condition subjective experience and the latter to specific, demarcated cultural groups. It is argued that these two meanings of culture must be kept apart, and that only the former is relevant to the project of understanding the range of cultural influences on mental health problems. This is premised on the idea, arising partially from anthropological critique, that while cultural designations (e.g. Maori or Muslim) might serve as important political and identity markers, they obscure rather than reveal the actual influences the subject is exposed to, and which condition subjective experience as seen through the modulation of distress or symptom formation.
机译:本文提供了对Hassim和Wagner在《南非精神病学杂志》(http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAJP.400)上发表的文章“考虑精神病理学公式中的文化背景”的评论。它阐明了文化和心理病理学概念的各个方面。在文化的内容与文化的划分之间有区别。前者指的是制约主观经验的社会习得的意义和意义,而后者指的是特定的,划定的文化群体。有人认为,文化的这两种含义必须分开,只有前者与理解文化对心理健康问题的影响范围有关。这是基于这样一种思想的前提,即该思想部分是由于人类学的批判而产生的,尽管文化名称(例如毛利人或穆斯林)可能是重要的政治和身份标志,但它们掩盖而不是揭示受试者所受到的实际影响,以及主观认为哪种条件通过调节遇险或症状形成来体验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号