...
首页> 外文期刊>Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research >Performance, behaviour and meat quality of beef heifers fed concentrate and straw offered as total mixed ration or free-choice
【24h】

Performance, behaviour and meat quality of beef heifers fed concentrate and straw offered as total mixed ration or free-choice

机译:饲喂浓缩饲料和秸秆的牛肉小母牛的性能,行为和肉质以混合定量或自由选择的形式提供

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Eighteen Simmental heifers were fed concentrate and barley straw offered as a total mixed ration (TMR) or separately as a free choice (FCH) to compare performance, behaviour, and meat quality. The heifers were assigned to treatments in a randomized complete block design. Animals were allotted to roofed pens with 3 animals per pen, and 3 pens per treatment. Intake of concentrate, average daily gain, and gain to feed ratio were not different between diets, being on average 7.6 kg/day, 1.38 kg/day and 0.18 kg/kg, respectively. Straw intake was greater in TMR than in FCH treatment (0.7 vs 0.3 kg/day, respectively; p <0.001). Crude protein intake, neutral detergent fibre intake and water consumption did not differ between treatments. Time spent eating was longer in FCH than in TMR ( p= 0.001), whereas time spent ruminating and total chewing time were longer ( p <0.01) in TMR than in FCH. The number of displacements resulting from competition for feed in the main feeder in TMR treatment tended to be greater than in FCH treatment. There were no differences in the carcass characteristics and quality of meat of animals assigned to the different feeding methods, but the percentage of 18:2 n-6 was higher in FCH treatment. In summary, these results suggest that the use of TMR as a feeding method in beef cattle fed high concentrate diets did not affect performance and increased time spent ruminating with a potential decrease of ruminal acidosis incidence.
机译:向18只西门塔尔小母牛饲喂精饲料和大麦秸秆,以总混合日粮(TMR)或自由选择(FCH)的形式进行比较,以比较性能,行为和肉质。小母牛以随机完整区组设计分配给处理。将动物分配给带顶棚的围栏,每只围栏3只动物,每次处理3只围栏。日粮中精矿的摄入量,平均日增重和饲料增重比没有差异,分别为平均7.6千克/天,1.38千克/天和0.18千克/千克。 TMR的秸秆摄入量高于FCH处理(分别为0.7和0.3千克/天; p <0.001)。不同处理之间粗蛋白质的摄入量,中性洗涤剂纤维的摄入量和水消耗没有差异。 FCH的进食时间比TMR的要长(p = 0.001),而TMR的反刍和总咀嚼时间比FCH的要长(p <0.01)。在TMR处理中,由主喂料器争夺饲料而导致的位移数往往大于FCH处理。采用不同喂养方法的动物的the体特征和肉质没有差异,但是在FCH处理中18:2 n-6的百分比更高。总之,这些结果表明,在以高浓缩日粮喂养的肉牛中,将TMR用作喂养方法不会影响生产性能,反刍时间的增加也可能导致瘤胃酸中毒发生率的降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号