首页> 外文期刊>Sociobiology >Pollinator Sharing in Specialized Bee Pollination Systems: a Test with the Synchronopatric Lip Flowers of Centrosema Benth (Fabaceae)
【24h】

Pollinator Sharing in Specialized Bee Pollination Systems: a Test with the Synchronopatric Lip Flowers of Centrosema Benth (Fabaceae)

机译:专门的蜜蜂授粉系统中的传粉媒介共享:对中生线虫(豆科)的同步性唇花的试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Bee-pollinated lip flowers of two synchronopatric species of Centrosema were used as models to examine the influence of specialized pollination systems on the ecological mechanisms of pollinator sharing. Regression analysis of bee abundances in the habitat on bee abundances on C. pubescens flowers was significant (r = 0.69; P = 0.001) and became very consistent and highly significant (r = 0.87; P = 0.00001) using a size threshold of bee pollinators longer than 15mm. These same relationships were not significant (P & 0.01), however, for C. brasilianum flowers. The structures of the two pollination systems also sustained the hypothesis of a size threshold for pollinators, although only the C. pubescens -bees interactions sustained the hypothesis of random interactions proportional to species abundances in the habitat. The flower visitor pools of the two plant species shared the same four main bee guilds: the pollinators Centridini, Xylocopa , and Euglossini and the primary nectar robber Oxaea . However, a significant divergence (P & 0.01) was detected between the two systems when the abundances and behaviors (pollinators or cheaters) of the main shared flower visitors were incorporated into the overall quantitative analysis (NMDS). The flowers size differences are not significant (P & 0.05) and could not explain these divergences. Particularly, the concentrations of the largest pollinators Eulaema and Xylocopa on C. pubescens flowers and the behavior shift of Centridini bees that act as legitimate pollinators in C. pubescens and as nectar robbers in C. brasilianum are better understood as functional foraging responses triggered by the synchronopatry and by nectar volume differences (P = 0.001) between both lip flowers. Paradoxically, the robbery activity of Centridini bees arises as a supply side effect of smaller nectar volume in C. brasilianum flowers.
机译:以两个杂食性杂食动物的蜂授粉唇花为模型,研究了专门授粉系统对授粉媒介共享生态机制的影响。使用蜜蜂授粉媒介的大小阈值,对栖息地中蜜蜂丰度与毛绒梭菌花上的蜜蜂丰度的回归分析非常显着(r = 0.69; P = 0.001),并且变得非常一致且高度显着(r = 0.87; P = 0.00001)。长于15mm。但是,对于巴西假单胞菌花,这些相同的关系并不显着(P> 0.01)。这两个授粉系统的结构也维持了传粉媒介大小阈值的假设,尽管只有毛毛虫-蜜蜂相互作用才支持与生境物种丰富度成正比的随机相互作用的假设。两种植物的访客花池共有四个主要的蜜蜂行会:传粉者Centridini,Xylocopa和Euglossini和主要的花蜜强盗Oxaea。然而,当将主要共享花访客的丰度和行为(授粉或作弊者)纳入整体定量分析(NMDS)时,在两个系统之间检测到显着差异(P <0.01)。花的大小差异不显着(P> 0.05),并且不能解释这些差异。尤其是,在毛白杨花上最大的传粉媒介Eulaema和Xylocopa的浓度以及在毛白杨中作为合法授粉媒介的Centricini蜜蜂的行为变化以及在巴西毛白杨中作为花蜜强盗的行为被更好地理解为由两种唇花之间的花蜜体积差异(P = 0.001)。矛盾的是,Centricini蜜蜂的抢劫活动是由于巴西小花茶中花蜜量较小的供应副作用引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号