...
首页> 外文期刊>Sodagem & inspecao >An??lise comparativa da gera?§?£o de fumos entre arames maci?§os (GMAW) e tubulares (FCAW)
【24h】

An??lise comparativa da gera?§?£o de fumos entre arames maci?§os (GMAW) e tubulares (FCAW)

机译:实心(GMAW)和管状(FCAW)线之间产生烟雾的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The GMAW (MIG /MAG) process is widespread in industry. However, it presents limitations regarding metallurgical aspects and geometrical characteristics of the weld bead. The FCAW process, on the other hand, due to presence of fluxes, achieves improvements on these aspects, but the flux might be responsible for larger fume emission. This paper aimed to present a comparative study of fume generation between the GMAW process with short-circuit metal transfer and the gas shielded FCAW process, using wires of same class of resistance (483 MPa of ultimate tension) and application. The experiments were performed in a fume chamber calibrated according to a standard. Both wires were evaluated using 100% CO2 as the shielding gas and at two current levels. The arc length effect and the use of another shielding gas (25% CO2 in argon) were also evaluated. Appropriate conditions of contact-tip-to-work-piece distance and arc voltage were selected for each wire-shielding gas combination as a means of making the comparison closer to the reality. The volume of the weld beads per meter was made the same for each level of current, by keeping the same relationship between wire deposition and welding travel speed. The results confirm a higher fume generation rate of the FCAW process (already expected) and that absolute fume generation rate grows as the welding current increases. However, for the GMAW process, analyzed from a relative point of view, it doesn't happen. It was verified that the current effect is more significant on the FCAW process. The increase in the CO2 content raised the fume generation rate only for the FCAW process, whilst the arc voltage variation did not demonstrate any effect on it.
机译:GMAW(MIG / MAG)流程在业界广泛使用。但是,它在焊缝的冶金学方面和几何特性方面存在局限性。另一方面,由于有助焊剂存在,FCAW工艺在这些方面都取得了进步,但助焊剂可能会导致更大的烟气排放。本文旨在通过使用具有相同电阻等级(极限张力为483 MPa)的电线,对短路金属转移的GMAW工艺与气体保护FCAW工艺之间的烟气产生进行比较研究。实验在根据标准校准的通风橱中进行。使用100%CO2作为保护气体并在两个电流水平下对两条导线进行了评估。还评估了电弧长度效应和使用另一种保护气体(氩气中的25%CO2)。为每种屏蔽气体组合选择合适的接触尖端到工件的距离和电弧电压的条件,作为使比较更接近实际的一种手段。通过在焊丝沉积和焊接行进速度之间保持相同的关系,使每米电流水平的每米焊珠体积相同。结果证实了FCAW工艺的烟气生成率更高(已经预期),并且绝对烟气生成率随着焊接电流的增加而增长。但是,对于GMAW流程,从相对角度进行分析,则不会发生。事实证明,目前的影响对FCAW进程更为重要。 CO 2含量的增加仅对于FCAW工艺提高了烟气的产生率,而电弧电压的变化并未对其产生任何影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号