首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >Social Media, Networked Protest, and the March for Science
【24h】

Social Media, Networked Protest, and the March for Science

机译:社交媒体,网络抗议和科学游行

获取原文
       

摘要

Recent studies have explored how the US public responded to the March for Science protests that took place around the world on April 22, 2017, as well as why individuals participated in these protests. Yet, little research has examined how participants used social media and other channels to learn, communicate, and form behavioral intentions regarding the movement. In addressing these questions, the present study conceptualizes the March for Science as a a??networked protest.a?? It then analyzes data from two surveys: one distributed through social media in the month preceding the March for Science events, and one conducted at the Washington, DC event. The results suggest that social mediaa??particularly Facebooka??played key roles in how respondents learned and communicated about the protest. At the same time, respondents also learned and communicated about it through other channels, including texting, email, and face-to-face conversations. Both social media respondents and in-person respondents reported that their experiences with the March had increased their likelihood of undertaking future online and offline actions. Furthermore, communicating through Facebook and Twitter predicted a range of self-reported effects of March experiences on intentions to undertake future actions, whereas learning through social media largely failed to do so. Thus, somea??but not alla??social media uses may have encouraged participants to sustain both online and offline engagement. Taken together, the findings carry potential implications for how the March for Science and other networked protests can use social media and other communication forms to mobilize supporters and facilitate long-term engagement.
机译:最近的研究探索了美国公众如何应对2017年4月22日在世界各地举行的三月科学抗议活动,以及个人为何参加这些抗议活动。但是,很少有研究检查参与者如何使用社交媒体和其他渠道来学习,交流和形成有关运动的行为意图。在解决这些问题时,本研究将“三月的科学”概念化为“网络抗议”。然后,它分析了两项调查的数据:一项是在3月举行的科学事件之前的一个月中通过社交媒体分发的,另一项是在华盛顿特区的事件中进行的。结果表明,社交媒体(尤其是Facebooka)在受访者如何学习和交流抗议活动中发挥了关键作用。同时,受访者还通过其他渠道(包括短信,电子邮件和面对面的对话)来学习和交流有关信息。社交媒体受访者和当面受访者均表示,他们在三月份的经历增加了他们将来进行在线和离线行动的可能性。此外,通过Facebook和Twitter进行的交流预测了3月经历对未来行动意图的一系列自我报告影响,而通过社交媒体进行的学习则大都没有这样做。因此,某种而非全部的社交媒体使用可能鼓励参与者维持在线和离线参与。综上,这些发现对《科学大游行》和其他网络抗议活动如何利用社交媒体和其他交流形式来动员支持者并促进长期参与具有潜在的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号