...
首页> 外文期刊>Singapore medical journal >Application of a standardised protocol for hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement improves quality of readings and facilitates reduction of variceal bleeding in cirrhotics
【24h】

Application of a standardised protocol for hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement improves quality of readings and facilitates reduction of variceal bleeding in cirrhotics

机译:标准化协议在肝静脉压梯度测量中的应用可提高读数质量,并有助于减少肝硬化患者的静脉曲张破裂出血

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is recommended for prognostic and therapeutic indications in centres with adequate resources and expertise. Our study aimed to evaluate the quality of HVPG measurements at our centre before and after introduction of a standardised protocol, and the clinical relevance of the HVPG to variceal bleeding in cirrhotics. METHODS HVPG measurements performed at Singapore General Hospital from 2005–2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Criteria for quality HVPG readings were triplicate readings, absence of negative pressure values and variability of ≤ 2 mmHg. The rate of variceal bleeding was compared in cirrhotics who achieved a HVPG response to pharmacotherapy (reduction of the HVPG to RESULTS 126 HVPG measurements were performed in 105 patients (mean age 54.7 ± 11.4 years; 55.2% men). 80% had liver cirrhosis and 20% had non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). The mean overall HVPG was 13.5 ± 7.2 mmHg, with a significant difference between the cirrhosis and NCPH groups (p CONCLUSION The quality of HVPG measurements in our centre improved after the introduction of a standardised protocol. A HVPG response can prognosticate the risk of variceal bleeding in cirrhotics.
机译:简介建议在有足够资源和专业知识的中心进行肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量,以用于预后和治疗指征。我们的研究旨在评估引入标准方案前后在我们中心进行的HVPG测量的质量,以及HVPG与肝硬化患者静脉曲张破裂出血的临床相关性。方法回顾性分析2005年至2013年在新加坡综合医院进行的HVPG测量。高质量HVPG读数的标准是一式三份,没有负压值,且变异性≤2 mmHg。比较了对药物疗法达到HVPG响应的肝硬化患者的曲张静脉出血率(将HVPG降低至结果)105例患者(平均年龄54.7±11.4岁; 55.2%男性)进行了126 HVPG测量,其中80%患有肝硬化和20%的患者患有非肝硬化门脉高压症(NCPH),平均总HVPG为13.5±7.2 mmHg,在肝硬化组和NCPH组之间存在显着差异(p结论结论HVPG反应可预后肝硬化患者静脉曲张破裂出血的风险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号