首页> 外文期刊>Silva Fennica >Structure of old Pinus sylvestris dominated forest stands along a geographic and human impact gradient in mid-boreal Fennoscandia.
【24h】

Structure of old Pinus sylvestris dominated forest stands along a geographic and human impact gradient in mid-boreal Fennoscandia.

机译:北部中部芬诺斯坎迪亚地区,以樟子松为主的森林结构沿地理和人类影响梯度分布。

获取原文
           

摘要

Stand structural characteristics were examined in old Pinus sylvestris dominated sites in three regions along a broad geographic and human impact gradient in mid-boreal Fennoscandia. The study regions were: 1) H?me in south-western Finland, with a long history of forest utilization, 2) Kuhmo in north-eastern Finland, with a more recent history of intensive forest utilization, and 3) Vienansalo in Russian Karelia, still characterized by a large near-natural forest landscape. Within each region the sampled sites were divided into three human impact classes: 1) near-natural stands, 2) stands selectively logged in the past, and 3) managed stands treated with thinnings. The near-natural and selectively logged stands in H?me and Kuhmo had a significantly higher Picea proportion compared to stands in Vienansalo. In comparison, the proportions of deciduous tree volumes were higher in near-natural stands in Vienansalo compared to near-natural stands in H?me. The pooled tree diameter distributions, both in near-natural and selectively logged stands, were descending whereas managed stands had a bimodal diameter distribution. Structural diversity characteristics such as broken trunks were most common in near-natural stands and in stands selectively logged in the past. The results demonstrate the higher structural complexity of near-natural stands and stands selectively logged in the past compared to managed stands, and highlight that old near-natural stands and stands selectively logged in the past vary widely in their structures. This obviously reflects both their natural variability but also various combinations of pre-industrial land use and human impact on fire disturbance. These factors need to be acknowledged when using “natural” forest structures as a reference in developing strategies for forest management, restoration and nature conservation.
机译:在北中部芬奴斯堪地亚沿广泛的地理和人类影响梯度,在三个地区的老樟子松占主导地位的地点中研究了林分的结构特征。研究区域为:1)芬兰西南部的H?me,具有悠久的森林利用历史; 2)芬兰东北部的Kuhmo,具有较近的森林密集利用历史,以及3)俄罗斯卡累利阿州的Vienansalo ,仍然以大片接近自然的森林景观为特征。在每个区域内,采样地点被划分为三种人类影响等级:1)近乎自然的林分; 2)过去有选择地伐木的林分; 3)经过间伐处理的受管理林分。与维埃纳萨洛的林分相比,H?me和Kuhmo中近乎自然且有选择性伐木的林分云杉比例更高。相比之下,维埃纳萨洛(Vienansalo)近自然林分中落叶乔木的比例要高于H?me中近自然林分。在近乎自然采伐和有选择采伐的林分中,合并的树木直径分布呈下降趋势,而管理林分具有双峰直径分布。在近乎自然的林分和过去有选择地伐木的林分中,树干折断等结构多样性特征最为常见。结果表明,与自然采伐的林分相比,过去选择性采伐的近自然林分和林分具有更高的结构复杂性,并突显了过去过去选择性采伐的近自然林分和林分的结构差异很大。显然,这既反映了它们的自然变异性,也反映了工业化前土地利用和人类对火灾的各种影响。当使用“天然”森林结构作为制定森林管理,恢复和自然保护战略的参考时,需要认识到这些因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号