...
首页> 外文期刊>Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etanercept in Combination with Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis - Markov Model Based on Data from Serbia
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etanercept in Combination with Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis - Markov Model Based on Data from Serbia

机译:基于塞尔维亚数据的依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-效果分析-Markov模型

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Biological therapeutic strategies have shown positive benefits for chronic and progressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical and radiological outcomes. Despite these results, the use of biological drugs in the treatment of RA is limited by high costs. The aim of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of etanercept in combination with methotrexate and methotrexate alone in patients with RA in the socioeconomic environment of a Balkan country.We conducted a cost-effectiveness study using a Markov model from a societal perspective with a time horizon of 480 months. The cycle duration was set to one month. The basic transition probabilities and data on therapeutic efficacy were estimated from the available literature, while costs were calculated using the medical documents of patients with RA treated at the Clinical Center Kragujevac.Our results indicated that treatment of patients with RA using methotrexate alone is more cost effective, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 1.446.640,78 RSD/QALY, than treatment with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 5.882.714,57 RSD/QALY.The use of etanercept to treat RA is not cost effective in the socioeconomic environment of Serbia. The cost-effectiveness ratio of biological drugs would be more favourable if special strategies for the pricing policy of biological drugs were established on the basis of local pharmacoeconomic studies.
机译:生物治疗策略已显示出对慢性和进行性类风湿关节炎(RA)的临床和放射学结局具有积极的益处。尽管有这些结果,但高成本限制了生物药物在类风湿关节炎的治疗中的应用。本研究旨在比较依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤和甲氨蝶呤在巴尔干国家社会经济环境中的RA患者的成本效果。我们从社会角度使用马尔可夫模型进行了一项成本效果研究,时间范围为480个月。周期持续时间设置为一个月。从现有文献中估算了基本的转移概率和治疗效果数据,而费用是根据在克拉格耶瓦茨临床中心接受治疗的RA患者的医学文献计算的,我们的结果表明仅使用甲氨蝶呤治疗RA患者的费用更高有效,成本效益比为1.446.640,78 RSD / QALY,比联合甲氨蝶呤和依那西普治疗的成本效益比为5.882.714,57 RSD / QALY。在塞尔维亚的社会经济环境中,RA的成本效益不高。如果在当地药理经济学研究的基础上制定生物药品价格政策的特殊策略,生物药品的成本效益比将更为有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号