首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of primary health care. >Point-of-care CRP matters: normal CRP levels reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing for acutely ill children in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Point-of-care CRP matters: normal CRP levels reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing for acutely ill children in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:即时护理CRP很重要:正常的CRP水平可减少初级保健中急症患儿的即时抗生素处方:一项整群随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Antibiotics are prescribed too often in acutely ill children in primary care. We examined whether a Point-of-Care (POC) C-reactive Protein (CRP) test influences the family physicians’ (FP) prescribing rate and adherence to the Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) practice guidelines. Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting: Primary care, Flanders, Belgium. Intervention: Half of the children with non-severe acute infections (random?allocation?of?practices?to perform POC CRP or not)?and all children at risk for serious infection were tested with POC CRP. Subjects: Acutely ill children consulting their FP. Main outcome measure: Immediate antibiotic prescribing. Results: 2844 infectious episodes recruited by 133 FPs between 15 February 2013 and 28 February 2014 were analyzed. A mixed logistic regression analysis was performed. Compared to episodes in which CRP was not tested, the mere performing of POC CRP reduced prescribing in case EBM practice guidelines advise to prescribe antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.54 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.33–0.90). Normal CRP levels reduced antibiotic prescribing, regardless of whether the advice was to prescribe (aOR 0.24 (95%CI 0.11–0.50) or to withhold (aOR 0.31 (95%CI 0.17–0.57)). Elevated CRP levels did not increase antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion: Normal CRP levels discourage immediate antibiotic prescribing, even when EBM practice guidelines advise differently. Most likely, a normal CRP convinces FPs to withhold antibiotics when guidelines go against their own gut feeling. Future research should focus on whether POC CRP can effectively identify children that benefit from antibiotics more accurately, without increasing the risks of under-prescribing. Key points What is previously known or believed on this topic ?Antibiotics are prescribed too often for non-severe conditions. Point-of-care (POC) C-reactive Protein (CRP) testing without guidance does not reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing in acutely ill children in primary care. What this research adds ?FPs clearly consider CRP once available: normal CRP levels discourage immediate antibiotic prescribing, even when EBM practice guidelines advise differently. Most likely, a normal CRP convinces FPs to withhold antibiotics when guidelines go against their own gut feeling. ?Future research should focus on whether POC CRP can effectively identify children that benefit from antibiotics more accurately, without increasing the risks of under-prescribing.
机译:目的:在基层医疗的急性病儿童中经常开抗生素处方。我们检查了即时护理(POC)C反应蛋白(CRP)测试是否影响家庭医生(FP)的开药率和对循证医学(EBM)执业指南的依从性。设计:分组随机对照试验。地点:比利时法兰德斯的初级保健。干预措施:一半非严重急性感染的孩子(是否随机分配进行POC CRP的做法)或所有有严重感染风险的孩子均接受POC CRP测试。受试者:重病儿童请教他们的FP。主要结果指标:立即开抗生素处方。结果:分析了2013年2月15日至2014年2月28日由133个FP招募的2844例传染病发作。进行了混合逻辑回归分析。与未测试CRP的情节相比,如果执行EBM操作指南建议开抗生素,则仅进行POC CRP可以减少处方(调整后的优势比(aOR)0.54(95%可信区间(CI)0.33–0.90)。无论建议是开处方(aOR 0.24(95%CI 0.11–0.50)还是戒烟(aOR 0.31(95%CI 0.17–0.57)),CRP水平升高均不会减少抗生素处方。 :正常的CRP水平会阻止立即开具抗生素处方,即使EBM实施指南的建议有所不同。正常的CRP最有可能在指南违背自己的直觉时说服FP拒绝使用抗生素。未来的研究应关注POC CRP是否可以有效地识别出儿童要更准确地从抗生素中受益,而又不会增加开药不足的风险要点以前在该主题上已知或认为的事情?非严酷条件。在没有指导的情况下进行即时医疗点(POC)C反应蛋白(CRP)测试不会减少在初级保健中急症患儿的即时抗生素处方。这项研究增加了什么?FPs清楚地认为CRP一旦可用:正常的CRP水平会阻止立即开具抗生素处方,即使EBM实践指南提出不同的建议。当指南违背自己的直觉时,正常的CRP最有可能说服FP拒绝使用抗生素。 ?未来的研究应集中在POC CRP是否可以有效地更准确地识别受益于抗生素的儿童,而不会增加开药不足的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号