...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology >Correlation of HVPG level with ctp score, MELD Score, ascites, size of varices, and etiology in cirrhotic patients
【24h】

Correlation of HVPG level with ctp score, MELD Score, ascites, size of varices, and etiology in cirrhotic patients

机译:肝硬化患者的HVPG水平与ctp评分,MELD评分,腹水,静脉曲张大小和病因相关

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background/Aim: This study intends to determine the correlation of a patient's hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement with six factors: Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, presence of ascites, size of varices, presence of variceal bleeding, and an etiology of cirrhosis. The study also aims to identify the predictors of higher HVPG measurements that can indirectly affect the prognosis of cirrhotic patients. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients diagnosed with cirrhosis were enrolled prospectively and each patient's HVPG level was measured by the transjugular catheterization of the right or middle hepatic vein. The wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) were measured using a 7F balloon catheter. The HVPG level was calculated as the difference between the WHVP and FHVP measurements. Results: The mean HVPG level was higher in alcoholic than in nonalcoholic cirrhosis (19.5 ± 7.3 vs 15.2 ± 4.5 mm Hg, P = 0.13). The mean HVPG was also higher in bleeders compared with nonbleeders (18.5 ± 5.3 vs 10.7 ± 3.1 mmHg, P = 0.001). Patients with varices had a higher mean HVPG level than those without varices (17.4 ± 5.8 vs 11.7 ± 3.9 mmHg, P = 0.04). The difference among the three categories of varices (small, large, and no varices) was statistically significant (P = 0.03). In addition, the mean HVPG level was higher in patients with ascites than in those without ascites (18.7 ± 4.7 vs 11 ± 5.3 mmHg, P = 0.002), and it was significantly higher in patients in CTP class C (21.8 ± 5.5 mmHg) as compared with those in CTP class B (16.9 ± 2.9 mmHg) and CTP class A (10.5 ± 4.1 mmHg; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: HVPG levels were significantly higher in patients in CTP class C as compared with those in CTP classes A and B, thereby indicating that an HVPG measurement correlates with severity of liver disease. A high HVPG level signifies more severe liver disease and can predict the major complications of cirrhosis.
机译:背景/目的:本研究旨在确定患者肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量与六个因素的相关性:Child–Turcotte–Pugh(CTP)评分,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,腹水,静脉曲张的大小,曲张静脉出血的存在以及肝硬化的病因。该研究的目的还在于确定可间接影响肝硬化患者预后的高HVPG测量指标。患者和方法:前瞻性纳入30例被诊断为肝硬化的患者,并通过右或中肝静脉经颈静脉导管插入术测量每位患者的HVPG水平。使用7F球囊导管测量楔形肝静脉压力(WHVP)和游离肝静脉压力(FHVP)。 HVPG水平计算为WHVP和FHVP测量值之间的差异。结果:酒精性肝炎患者的平均HVPG水平高于非酒精性肝硬化患者(19.5±7.3对15.2±4.5 mm Hg,P = 0.13)。与非出血者相比,出血者的平均HVPG也更高(18.5±5.3对10.7±3.1 mmHg,P = 0.001)。有静脉曲张的患者的平均HVPG水平高于无静脉曲张的患者(17.4±5.8 vs 11.7±3.9 mmHg,P = 0.04)。三种静脉曲张(小,大和无静脉曲张)之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.03)。此外,有腹水的患者的平均HVPG水平高于无腹水的患者(18.7±4.7 vs 11±5.3 mmHg,P = 0.002),而CTP C级患者的平均HVPG水平显着较高(21.8±5.5 mmHg)。与CTP B级(16.9±2.9 mmHg)和CTP A级(10.5±4.1 mmHg; P≤0.001)相比。结论:CTP C类患者的HVPG水平显着高于CTP A类和B类患者,这表明HVPG测量与肝病严重程度相关。高HVPG水平表示更严重的肝脏疾病,可以预测肝硬化的主要并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号