首页> 外文期刊>Otolaryngology Online Journal >COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT WITH MYRINGOPLASTY AND CHEMICAL CAUTERISATION IN TUBO-TYMPANIC TYPE OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA
【24h】

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT WITH MYRINGOPLASTY AND CHEMICAL CAUTERISATION IN TUBO-TYMPANIC TYPE OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA

机译:管型鼓膜型慢性化脓性中耳炎的子宫增生和化学分类处理的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction CSOM is highly prevalent chronic ear disease. In developing countries like India, where tertiary medical facility is not available to all people, treatment should be cost effective and easily feasible at even primary health centre. With this background a study was performed for closure of small to moderate central perforation with chemical cauterisation and to see whether it is equally effective as that of Myringoplasty or not. Study design: prospective clinical study. Methodology: To compare results of chemical cauterisation (TCA) with myringoplasty on non healing small and medium sized central tympanic membrane perforation of pars tensa, 100 patients with dry tympanic membrane perforations. Result: 1) Success rate with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation were 76% and 72% respectively. 2) The improvement of hearing at 3rd month of follow-up after successful procedure with myringoplasty and chemical cauterisation in term of air bone gap less than 10 db were 68.4% and 88.88% respectively Conclusion: 1) For closure of small central perforation chemical cauterisation is equally effective as myringoplasty. 2) For closure of moderate central perforation, myringoplasty is superior to chemical cauterisation. 3) Hearing improvement was observed better for chemical cauterisation as compared to Myringoplasty.
机译:简介CSOM是高度流行的慢性耳部疾病。在像印度这样的发展中国家,那里的所有人都无法获得三级医疗设施,因此治疗应该具有成本效益,即使在初级保健中心也很容易实现。在这种背景下,进行了一项研究,以通过化学灼烧封闭小到中等的中央穿孔,并观察其是否等同于Myringoplasty。研究设计:前瞻性临床研究。方法:比较100例干性鼓膜穿孔的中,非治愈性中小鼓膜穿孔的化学灼烧(TCA)与鼓室成形术的结果。结果:1)子宫成形术和化学烧灼的成功率分别为76%和72%。 2)在成功进行鼓膜成形术和化学烧灼后的第三个月随访中,空气间隙小于10 db的改善分别为68.4%和88.88%。结论:1)对于小型中央穿孔化学烧灼的闭合与青皮成形术一样有效。 2)对于中度中央穿孔的闭合,鼓膜成形术优于化学烧灼术。 3)与Myringoplasty相比,化学灼烧的听力改善更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号