首页> 外文期刊>Safety in health. >6th Grazer Risk Day: The Future of Yesterday in Healthcare
【24h】

6th Grazer Risk Day: The Future of Yesterday in Healthcare

机译:第六届Grazer风险日:医疗保健领域的未来

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundWithin our organization the critical incident reporting system (CIRS)was introduced in 2013. Since then, only limited use can be recognizedin terms of how many CIRS-cases were reported to the onlineavailablesystem. Reasons for underreporting are divers, however,dominantly it’s the fear of healthcare workers (HCW) whether theanonymity of the reporting employee is preserved. Consequently, weanalyzed CIRS-publication data from 2013 to 2017 in order to interpretthe development of CIRS in a tertiary university hospital.Material and methodsBased on reported CIRS-cases since the introduction of the onlineavailablesystem, data were analyzed according to the total numberof reported CIRS-cases, who reported a CIRS-case, which specialtyused CIRS and finally what kind of risk was reported most often. Wealso distinguished if the reported CIRS-case was in term of our definitiona correct CIRS-case or a so-called near miss (relevant for employeesafety) or if it was a patient harm.ResultsIn total 683 cases were reported into the CIRS, of which only 283 hadbeen a correct CIRS-case. 400 cases had been no CIRS or near misscase. Predominantly, CIRS-cases concerning surgical processes werereported (16%), followed by CIRS-cases concerning medicinal products(16%) and CIRS-cases concerning medical devices (10%). It wasmore likely, that nurses reported into CIRS (44%) than by physicians(24%). 45% of all CIRS-cases were reported by surgical disciplines,21% by interdisciplinary organization, 16% by non-surgical disciplinesand 13% came from anaesthesiology.ConclusionsA CIR-system is an essential component of clinical risk managementand is a simple tool that can be used to identify potential sources ofcritical incidents (1). CIRS can be a valuable instrument if CIRS is usedas foreseen. As CIRS is used just in rare situations according to thepresented data, CIRS should be introduced more comprehensively toconvince HCW that reporting into CIRS is safe and that any CIRS-casecan help to avoid future harm to patients.
机译:背景技术我们组织内部于2013年引入了关键事件报告系统(CIRS)。从那时起,就向在线可用系统报告了多少CIRS案例而言,只能识别有限的使用。漏报的原因是潜水员,但是,主要是担心医护人员(HCW)是否保留举报员工的匿名性。因此,我们分析了2013年至2017年的CIRS发布数据,以解释三级大学医院CIRS的发展情况。材料和方法基于自在线上线系统引入以来报告的CIRS病例,根据报告的CIRS-总数案例,他们报告了CIRS案例,专门针对CIRS,最后报告了最常见的风险。我们还区分了报告的CIRS病例是否符合我们的定义:正确的CIRS病例或所谓的险险(与员工安全有关)或是否是患者伤害。结果总共有683例病例报告到CIRS中,其中只有283个正确的CIRS案例。没有CIRS或接近误案的案例有400例。报告主要涉及外科手术的CIRS病例(16%),其次是关于医药产品的CIRS病例(16%)和关于医疗器械的CIRS病例(10%)。护士报告CIRS的可能性更高(44%),而不是医师报告的比率(24%)。在所有CIRS病例中,有45%是由外科学科报告的,跨学科组织报告的为21%,非外科学科报告的为16%,麻醉学为13%。用于识别关键事件的潜在来源(1)。如果按预期使用CIRS,则CIRS可能是有价值的工具。根据提供的数据,由于CIRS仅在极少数情况下使用,因此应更全面地引入CIRS,以使HCW确信向CIRS报告是安全的,任何CIRS病例都可以帮助避免对患者的未来伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号