...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Simple modification of trauma mechanism alarm criteria published for the TraumaNetwork DGU ? may significantly improve overtriage – a cross sectional study
【24h】

Simple modification of trauma mechanism alarm criteria published for the TraumaNetwork DGU ? may significantly improve overtriage – a cross sectional study

机译:为TraumaNetwork DGU发布的创伤机制警报标准的简单修改?可能会显着改善过度分流–一项横断面研究

获取原文

摘要

No consensus exists in the literature on the use of uniform emergency room trauma team activation criteria (ERTTAC). Today excessive over- or undertriage rates continue to be a challenge for most trauma centres. Application of ERTTAC, published for use in the German TraumaNetwork DGU?, at a Swiss trauma centre resulted in a high overtriage rate. The aim of the investigation was to analyse the ERTTAC in detail with the intention of possible improvement. The investigation included consecutive adult (age?>?15?years) trauma patients treated at the emergency department of a level II trauma centre from 01.01.2013–31.12.2015. All data were collected prospectively. To identify over- and undertriage, patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >?15 were defined as requiring specific emergency room (ER) management. ANOVA, Student’s t-test and chi-square analysis were used for statistical analysis with mean values ± standard deviation. 1378 adult injured (64% male) received ER trauma team treatment (mean age 48.3?±?21.2?years; ISS 9.7?±?9.6) during the observation period. Of those, 326 ER patients (23.7%) were diagnosed with an ISS?>?15, which proved to be an overtriage of 76.3%. 80/406 trauma patients with an ISS >?15 were not referred to the ER, resulting in an actual undertriage rate of 19.7%, mainly because the criteria list was not observed. Effectively applying ERTTAC according to the protocol in all cases would have reduced undertriage to 2.0% (8/406). The most frequent trigger for trauma team activation was injury mechanism (65%). A simulation revealed that omitting the criterion ‘passenger of car or truck’ (n?=?326) would have prevented overtriage in 257 cases, as such lowering overtriage rate to 62.4% and at the same time increasing undertriage by only 8 cases to 7.1%. Application of ERTTAC as published for TraumaNetwork DGU? resulted in a lower undertriage but higher overtriage rate than recommended by the American College of Surgeons. Omitting the criterion ‘passenger of car or truck’ markedly improved overtriage with only a minimal increase in undertriage. NCT02165137 ; retrospectively registered 11. June 2014.
机译:关于使用统一急诊室创伤小组激活标准(ERTTAC)的文献,尚无共识。如今,过高或偏低的比率仍然是大多数创伤中心的挑战。 ERTTAC在瑞士创伤中心的应用已在德国创伤中心DGU?中公开使用,导致高分流率。调查的目的是详细分析ERTTAC,以进行可能的改进。该研究包括从2013年1月1日至2015年3月31日在II级创伤中心急诊室接受治疗的连续成年(年龄≥15岁)创伤患者。所有数据均前瞻性收集。为了识别过度流产和未流产,将损伤严重度评分(ISS)> 15的患者定义为需要特定的急诊室(ER)管理。方差分析,Student's t检验和卡方分析用于统计分析,均值±标准差。在观察期内,有1378名成人受伤(64%的男性)接受了ER创伤小组治疗(平均年龄48.3±21.2岁; ISS 9.7±9.6)。在这些患者中,有326名ER患者(23.7%)被诊断出ISS≥15,这证明了76.3%的过度分流。没有将ISS>?15的80/406位创伤患者转诊至ER,导致实际未足分检率达到19.7%,主要是因为未遵守标准列表。在所有情况下,根据该协议有效地应用ERTTAC可以将未分类率降低到2.0%(8/406)。创伤团队激活的最常见诱因是伤害机制(65%)。模拟显示,省略“汽车或卡车的乘客”标准(n?=?326)可以防止257件案件中的过分流失,因为这样可以将过分流失率降低到62.4%,而同时将过低流失率仅增加8例到7.1。 %。为TraumaNetwork DGU发布的ERTTAC的应用?导致比美国外科医生学院推荐的更低的未分类率但更高的过度分类率。忽略“乘用车或卡车的乘客”标准可显着改善超额分流,而最低分流仅增加很小的几率。 NCT02165137;追溯注册于2014年6月11日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号