首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Patient and case characteristics associated with ‘no paramedic treatment’ for low-acuity cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following a secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Patient and case characteristics associated with ‘no paramedic treatment’ for low-acuity cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following a secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study

机译:二次电话分诊后转诊至急诊救护的低眼力病例与“不进行护理人员治疗”相关的患者和病例特征:回顾性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Predicting case types that are unlikely to be treated by paramedics can aid in managing demand for emergency ambulances by identifying cases suitable for alternative management pathways. The aim of this study was to identify the patient characteristics and triage outcomes associated with ‘no paramedic treatment’ for cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following secondary telephone triage. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following secondary telephone triage between September 2009 and June 2012. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify explanatory variables associated with ‘no paramedic treatment’. There were 19,041 cases eligible for inclusion in this study over almost three years, of which 8510 (44.7%) were not treated after being sent an emergency ambulance following secondary triage. Age, time of day, pain, triage guideline group, and comorbidities were associated with ‘no paramedic treatment’. In particular, cases 0–4?years of age or those with psychiatric conditions were significantly less likely to be treated by paramedics, and increasing pain resulted in higher rates of paramedic treatment. This study highlights that case characteristics can be used to identify particular case types that may benefit from care pathways other than emergency ambulance dispatch. This process is also useful to identify gaps in the alternative care pathways currently available. These findings offer the opportunity to optimise secondary telephone triage services to support their strategic purpose of minimising unnecessary emergency ambulance demand and to match the right case with the right care pathway.
机译:预测不太可能由医护人员处理的病例类型,可以通过识别适合替代管理途径的病例,来帮助管理对紧急救护车的需求。这项研究的目的是确定在二次电话分诊后转诊至急救车的病例与“不进行护理人员治疗”相关的患者特征和分诊结果。对2009年9月至2012年6月进行二次电话分诊后转诊至紧急救护车的病例进行了回顾性队列分析。多变量logistic回归模型用于识别与“无护理人员治疗”相关的解释变量。近三年来有19,041例符合条件纳入本研究的病例,其中8510例(44.7%)在二次分流后被送往急救车后未得到治疗。年龄,一天中的时间,疼痛,分类指南组和合并症均与“不进行护理人员治疗”相关。特别是0-4岁或患有精神疾病的患者接受护理人员治疗的可能性大大降低,并且疼痛加剧导致护理人员治疗的比率更高。这项研究强调,案例特征可用于识别可从紧急救护车调度以外的其他护理途径中受益的特定案例类型。该过程对于确定当前可用替代治疗途径中的差距也很有用。这些发现为优化辅助电话分诊服务提供了机会,以支持其将不必要的紧急救护车需求降至最低的战略目标,并使正确的案例与正确的护理路径相匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号