首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >“Subcritical” Glenoid Bone Loss Increases Redislocation Rates in Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
【24h】

“Subcritical” Glenoid Bone Loss Increases Redislocation Rates in Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

机译:“亚临界”关节盂骨丢失增加了初次关节镜Bankart修复的再分配率

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: While bone loss is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for failure after arthroscopic stabilization, the precise definition of critical bone loss has not been defined. Additionally, there is no clarity on the amount of bone loss routinely present in patients presenting for primary arthroscopic stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. The purpose of this study is to report on the average bone loss measured in primary isolated Bankart reconstructions of the shoulder and to determine what amount of bone loss correlated to a recurrence of instability. Methods: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 94 anterior instability patients (97 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic labral repair at a single military institution by one of three fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Data was collected on demographics and rate of redislocation as reported by the patient at the most recent follow-up. Glenoid bone loss was calculated from preoperative imagining using a “perfect-circle” technique. Patients were excluded if they had previously undergone any stabilization procedure. Results: The average age at surgery was 25.6 years (range, 16-42) with average follow-up of 36.8 months (range, 20-57). There were 5 females (5 shoulders) and 89 males (92 shoulders). The average bone loss in all patients was 14.4% (range, 0-34.7%). When analyzed based on the presence or absence of recurrence, there were 77 stable shoulders with no redislocations. In this group, the average bone loss was 14.5% (range, 0-33.3%) with a follow-up of 36.3 months (range, 20-57). There were 20 patients with recurrent dislocations who had an average of 20.8% (range, 0-33.3%) with a 39.1 month (range, 21-56) follow-up. There was a significantly greater amount of bone loss in those with redislocations (p=0.004). When further analyzed, there was a 95% likelihood of redislocation with 17.1% bone loss there was a 25% likelihood of redislocation with 7.0% bone loss. Conclusion: This study suggests that glenoid bone loss is a common finding in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic stabilization. Additionally, patients with “subcritical” bone loss of 17.1% are at a higher risk to have a recurrence than those with lesser amounts of bone loss. Patients with bone loss beyond this threshold should be counseled accordingly with consideration for alternative surgical procedures.
机译:目标:虽然越来越多的人认为骨丢失是关节镜稳定术后失败的危险因素,但尚未定义关键骨丢失的确切定义。此外,对于关节镜稳定前盂肱骨不稳定性的患者,常规存在的骨丢失量尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是报告在肩关节一次孤立的Bankart重建术中测得的平均骨丢失,并确定与不稳定性复发相关的骨丢失量。方法:这是一项回顾性综述,该研究连续随访了94名前不稳定患者(97例肩部患者),这些患者由三名受过研究金培训的骨科医生在一家军事机构中进行了关节镜下的唇修复。最近一次随访中,患者报告了有关人口统计学和再分配率的数据。使用“完美圆”技术从术前想象中计算出盂骨损失。如果患者以前曾接受过任何稳定手术,则将其排除在外。结果:手术的平均年龄为25.6岁(范围16-42),平均随访36.8个月(范围20-57)。女性5例(5肩),男性89例(92肩)。所有患者的平均骨质流失率为14.4%(范围为0-34.7%)。根据是否存在复发进行分析时,有77个稳定的肩部,没有重新定位。在该组中,平均骨质流失率为14.5%(范围为0-33.3%),随访时间为36.3个月(范围为20-57)。有20例复发性脱位患者平均随访20.8%(范围:0-33.3%),随访时间为39.1个月(范围:21-56)。在重新定位的患者中,骨丢失的数量明显更多(p = 0.004)。进一步分析时,重新定位的可能性为95%,骨丢失为17.1%,重新定位的可能性为25%,骨丢失为7.0%。结论:这项研究表明关节盂骨丢失是接受原发性关节镜稳定术的患者的常见发现。此外,“亚临界”骨丢失为17.1%的患者发生复发的风险要高于那些骨丢失较少的患者。骨丢失超过此阈值的患者应接受相应的咨询,并考虑采取其他手术方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号