首页> 外文期刊>Safety >How Did Crew Resource Management Take-Off Outside of the Cockpit? A Systematic Review of How Crew Resource Management Training Is Conceptualised and Evaluated for Non-Pilots
【24h】

How Did Crew Resource Management Take-Off Outside of the Cockpit? A Systematic Review of How Crew Resource Management Training Is Conceptualised and Evaluated for Non-Pilots

机译:机组人员资源管理如何在驾驶舱外起飞?对非飞行员的船员资源管理培训的概念和评估方式的系统回顾

获取原文
           

摘要

Crew resource management (CRM) training for flight crews is widespread and has been credited with improving aviation safety. As other industries have adopted CRM, they have interpreted CRM in different ways. We sought to understand how industries have adopted CRM, regarding its conceptualisation and evaluation. For this, we conducted a systematic review of CRM studies in the Maritime, Nuclear Power, Oil and Gas, and Air Traffic Control industries. We searched three electronic databases (Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus) and CRM reviews for papers. We analysed these papers on their goals, scope, levers of change, and evaluation. To synthesise, we compared the analysis results across industries. We found that most CRM programs have the broad goals of improving safety and efficiency. However, there are differences in the scope and levers of change between programs, both within and between industries. Most evaluative studies suffer from methodological weaknesses, and the evaluation does not align with how studies conceptualise CRM. These results challenge the assumption that there is a clear link between CRM training and enhanced safety in the analysed industries. Future CRM research needs to provide a clear conceptualisation?¢????how CRM is expected to improve safety?¢????and select evaluation measures consistent with this.
机译:机组人员的机组人员资源管理(CRM)培训非常广泛,并因提高航空安全性而得到认可。随着其他行业采用CRM,他们以不同的方式解释CRM。我们试图了解行业在概念化和评估方面如何采用CRM。为此,我们对海事,核电,石油和天然气以及空中交通管制行业的CRM研究进行了系统的回顾。我们搜索了三个电子数据库(Web of Science,Science Direct,Scopus)和CRM评论。我们分析了这些文件的目标,范围,变更杠杆和评估。为了进行综合,我们比较了各个行业的分析结果。我们发现,大多数CRM程序都有提高安全性和效率的广泛目标。但是,行业内部和行业之间的计划之间的变化范围和变化杠杆存在差异。大多数评估研究都存在方法论上的弱点,并且评估与研究如何将CRM概念化不符。这些结果挑战了以下假设:分析行业中CRM培训与增强的安全性之间存在明确的联系。未来的CRM研究需要提供清晰的概念化-期望CRM如何改善安全性-并选择与此相符的评估措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号