...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Accuracy of Manual Surgeon-Defined Assessment of Soft Tissue Balance in TKA In Comparison to Sensor-Guided Measures and its Effect on Final Balance
【24h】

Accuracy of Manual Surgeon-Defined Assessment of Soft Tissue Balance in TKA In Comparison to Sensor-Guided Measures and its Effect on Final Balance

机译:与传感器引导的措施相比,由外科医生定义的TKA中软组织平衡评估的准确性及其对最终平衡的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: Present literature supports the importance of final alignment and soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on implant survivorship and clinical outcomes. Current soft tissue balance techniques mostly depend on subjective static measures that don’t allow for quantitative determination of ligament tension. Sensor guided technique (Verasense, Orthosensor) allows demonstration of the magnitude and location of load in a dynamic way providing quantitative data about knee balance. The aim of this study is to test the accuracy of the surgeon’s manual assessment in judging knee balance in comparison to Verasense. We also aimed to determine whether Verasense can assist in achieving soft tissue balance from the unbalanced state. Methods: 58 patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. The level of agreement between SDA and Verasense at 10, 45, 90 degrees was recorded. Initial trial pressures and final pressures after release or re-cut were recorded and compared. Final pressure measurements were then documented to assess whether appropriate knee balance (differential compartmental pressure of 15 lb/inch on 2 or more angular positions) had been achieved. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 67.5 years with deformities ranging from -16 degrees of varus to +20 degrees of valgus (mean -1.26 degrees varus). The capacity for the surgeon to manually identify an unbalanced knee was low with a test sensitivity of 33.3%. Manual test specificity to define a balanced knee was better with a specificity of 77.3%. The manual test had a positive predicitive value of 59.2% and a negative predictive value of 54%. There were 46.5% (27 of 58) of cases where the Verasense lead to a different surgical plan to that initially determined by the manual assessment. In 23 cases, either ligament release or tibial bone recut was performed. In the remaining 4 cases, the Verasense prevented a ligament release being performed. 95% of cases achieved a balanced state within 15lb/inch of pressure between compartments, with 100% balanced within 25 lb/inch. Conclusion: Manual surgeon assessment of soft tissue balance is a poor predictor of unbalanced knees. Verasense has the capacity to subsequently balance the knee within an acceptable pressure range as defined by prior studies. Further analysis to determine the impact on patient outcomes and implant survivorship is warranted.
机译:目的:目前的文献支持最终对准和软组织平衡在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中对植入物存活率和临床结果的重要性。当前的软组织平衡技术主要依赖于主观静态测量,无法定量确定韧带张力。传感器引导技术(Verasense,Orthosensor)允许以动态方式演示负载的大小和位置,从而提供有关膝盖平衡的定量数据。这项研究的目的是检验与Verasense相比,外科医生在评估膝盖平衡方面的手动评估的准确性。我们还旨在确定Verasense是否可以从不平衡状态帮助实现软组织平衡。方法:58名患者参加了这项前瞻性队列研究。记录SDA与Verasense之间在10、45、90度之间的一致程度。记录并比较释放或重新切割后的初始试验压力和最终压力。然后记录最终压力测量值,以评估是否已达到适当的膝盖平衡(在2个或更多角度位置上的15磅/英寸的压差)。结果:该队列的平均年龄为67.5岁,畸形的范围从-16内翻到+20内翻(平均为-1.26内翻)。外科医生手动识别不平衡膝盖的能力很低,测试灵敏度为33.3%。手动测试的特异性可以更好地定义膝盖的平衡,特异性为77.3%。手动测试的阳性预测值为59.2%,阴性预测值为54%。 Verasense导致与人工评估最初确定的计划不同的手术计划的案例占46.5%(58个中的27个)。在23例中,进行了韧带释放或胫骨骨切除术。在其余的4种情况下,Verasense阻止了韧带的释放。 95%的箱子在隔室之间的压力达到15lb / inch时达到平衡状态,而100%的平衡达到25 lb / inch时处于平衡状态。结论:手动外科医生评估软组织平衡不能很好地预测膝盖不平衡。 Verasense有能力随后在先前研究定义的可接受压力范围内平衡膝盖。有必要进行进一步分析以确定对患者预后和种植体存活率的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号