...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Controlled Laboratory Comparison Study of Motion With Football Equipment in a Destabilized Cervical Spine
【24h】

Controlled Laboratory Comparison Study of Motion With Football Equipment in a Destabilized Cervical Spine

机译:颈椎不稳定时足球器械运动的受控实验室比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Numerous studies have shown that there are better alternatives to log rolling patients with unstable spinal injuries, although this method is still commonly used for placing patients onto a spine board. No previous studies have examined transfer maneuvers involving an injured football player with equipment in place onto a spine board. Purpose To test 3 different transfer maneuvers of an injured football player onto a spine board to determine which method most effectively minimizes spinal motion in an injured cervical spine model. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Five whole, lightly embalmed cadavers were fitted with shoulder pads and helmets and tested both before and after global instability was surgically created at C5-C6. An electromagnetic motion analysis device was used to assess the amount of angular and linear motion with sensors placed above and below the injured segment during transfer. Spine-boarding techniques evaluated were the log roll, the lift and slide, and the 8-person lift. Results The 8-person lift technique resulted in the least amount of angular and linear motion for all planes tested as compared with the lift-and-slide and log-roll techniques. This reached statistical significance for lateral bending ( P = .031) and medial-lateral translation ( P = .030) when compared with the log-roll maneuver. The lift-and-slide technique was significantly more effective at reducing motion than the log roll for axial rotation ( P = .029) and lateral bending ( P = .006). Conclusion The log roll resulted in the most motion at an unstable cervical injury as compared with the other 2 spine-boarding techniques examined. The 8-person lift and lift-and-slide techniques may both be more effective than the log roll at reducing unwanted cervical spine motion when spine boarding an injured football player. Reduction of such motion is critical in the prevention of iatrogenic injury.
机译:背景技术大量研究表明,对于不稳定脊柱损伤的滚动患者,有更好的选择,尽管这种方法仍常用于将患者放置在脊柱板上。先前的研究都没有检查涉及受伤足球运动员的运动技巧,并将受伤的球员装备在脊柱板上。目的测试受伤的足球运动员在脊柱板上的3种不同的转移动作,以确定哪种方法最有效地最小化了受伤的颈椎模型中的脊柱运动。研究设计受控的实验室研究。方法在C5-C6手术造成整体不稳定之前和之后,对五只完整的轻防腐尸体安装了肩垫和头盔,并进行了测试。电磁运动分析设备用于评估在传输过程中受伤部位上方和下方放置传感器的角度和线性运动量。评估的脊椎登高技术是原木滚转,举升和滑行以及8人举升。结果与举升和滑动以及对数滚动技术相比,八人举升技术使所有测试平面的角向运动和直线运动最少。与对数滚动操作相比,这对于侧向弯曲(P = .031)和内侧-外侧平移(P = .030)达到了统计意义。对于轴向旋转(P = .029)和侧向弯曲(P = .006),升降滑动技术在降低运动方面比原木辊有效得多。结论与其他2种脊椎登板技术相比,原木滚动导致不稳定颈椎损伤时动作最多。当脊椎登上受伤的足球运动员时,八人举重和举重与滑行技术在减少不必要的颈椎运动方面可能比对数滚动更有效。减少这种运动对于预防医源性伤害至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号