...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Non-Weight Bearing versus Partial Controlled Early Weight Bearing after Reconstruction of the Fibular Collateral Ligament: A Randomized Control Trial
【24h】

Non-Weight Bearing versus Partial Controlled Early Weight Bearing after Reconstruction of the Fibular Collateral Ligament: A Randomized Control Trial

机译:腓骨侧副韧带重建后非承重vs.部分控制的早期承重:随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To 1) determine if early protected weight bearing after an FCL reconstruction was safe based upon an objective difference in laxity on varus stress radiographs at six months postoperatively between patients who were non-weight bearing versus partial controlled weight bearing during the first six weeks of postoperative rehabilitation and 2) determine if there was a difference in pain, edema, and range-of-motion between these two groups at three different time points. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled from January 2014 to April 2017. Patients were included in the study if they were undergoing an isolated FCL reconstruction or combined ACL and FCL reconstructions. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control group, which was non-weight bearing for 6 weeks, or a treatment group with partial controlled weight bearing at 40% body weight with crutches for 6 weeks. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age, pregnant, undergoing a revision FCL reconstruction, concurrent medial collateral and/or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, radial or root meniscal repairs, genu varus alignment in patients with chronic FCL tears, or had a body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m~(2). Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, with 6 month follow-up obtained in 36 patients (92%). Twenty-five patients (69.4%) had an acute injury (≤ 6 weeks) and 11 patients (30.6%) had a chronic injury (> 6 weeks). The mean time from injury to surgery was 2.3 ± 1.9 weeks and 41.5 ± 37.4 weeks for acute and chronic patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient age (p = .157) or BMI (p = .534) between the control and treatment groups. Postoperatively (0-6 months), there were no complications reported and no surgical re-interventions for ligamentous reconstruction failure or arthrofibrosis in either group. There was a significant difference between the preoperative side-to-side difference (SSD) (2.4 ± 1.0) and postoperative SSD (0.2 ± 1.0) for lateral compartment gapping on varus stress radiographs in all patients (p< .001). For the control group, the lateral compartment SSD on varus stress radiographs was reduced from 2.4 ± 1.1 to 0.1 ± 1.1 from preoperative to 6 months postoperative (p < .001). For the treatment group, the SSD on varus stress radiographs reduced from 2.3 ± 0.8 to 0.2 ± 0.8 from preoperative to 6 months postoperative respectively (p < .001). There were no significant differences between the preoperative SSD and postoperative SSD on varus stress radiographs between the control and treatment groups. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in subjective outcome scores (IKDC, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC physical function, WOMAC total, Lysholm, and Tegner scores) between the preoperative and 6 months postoperative conditions (p < .001). There were no significant differences for the outcome measures of pain, edema, and knee range of motion between control and treatment groups at any time points. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between patients who were non-weight bearing compared to early weight bearing at 6 months postoperatively regarding knee stability, pain, swelling, and range-of-motion. We recommend early partial weight bearing following an isolated FCL reconstruction or when combined with an ACL reconstruction because our study found it did not compromise the integrity of the FCL reconstruction graft.
机译:目的:到1)根据前六个星期非负重与部分控制负重患者术后六个月内翻应力X线片的松弛度的客观差异,确定FCL重建后早期保护负重是否安全2)确定两组在三个不同时间点的疼痛,水肿和运动范围是否存在差异。方法:从2014年1月至2017年4月对患者进行前瞻性研究。如果患者正在接受单独的FCL重建或ACL和FCL联合重建,则将其纳入研究。将患者随机分为对照组(不承重6周)或治疗组(部分控制承重40%体重并带有拐杖)6周。如果患者年龄小于18岁,怀孕,正在接受FCL翻修重建,同时进行内侧副和/或后交叉韧带重建,radial骨或根半月板修复,慢性FCL撕裂患者的内翻内翻对齐或已患有该病,则排除患者体重指数≥35 kg / m〜(2)。结果:39名患者入选了该研究,其中36例(92%)获得了6个月的随访。 25名患者(69.4%)受到了急性损伤(≤6周),而11名患者(30.6%)受到了慢性损伤(> 6周)。急性和慢性患者从受伤到手术的平均时间分别为2.3±1.9周和41.5±37.4周。对照组和治疗组之间的患者年龄(p = .157)或BMI(p = .534)没有显着差异。术后(0-6个月),两组均未报告并发症,也没有因韧带重建失败或关节纤维化而进行外科手术再干预。在所有患者的内翻应力X光片上,术前侧向间隙差异(SSD)(2.4±1.0)和术后SSD(0.2±1.0)之间存在明显的差异(p <.001)。对于对照组,术前至术后6个月内翻X线照片上的侧部室SSD从2.4±1.1降低至0.1±1.1(p <.001)。对于治疗组,内翻X线片上的SSD从术前至术后6个月分别从2.3±0.8降至0.2±0.8(p <.001)。在对照组和治疗组之间的内翻X线照片上,术前SSD和术后SSD之间无显着差异。在术前至术后6个月之间,所有患者的主观结局评分(IKDC,WOMAC疼痛,WOMAC僵硬,WOMAC身体机能,WOMAC总评分,Lysholm和Tegner评分)均显着改善(p <.001)。对照组和治疗组在任何时间点的疼痛,水肿和膝关节活动范围的结局指标均无显着差异。结论:术后6个月,非负重患者与早期负重患者之间在膝关节稳定性,疼痛,肿胀和运动范围方面无显着差异。我们建议在单独的FCL重建后或与ACL重建相结合时尽早承受部分负重,因为我们的研究发现它不会损害FCL重建移植物的完整性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号