...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Evaluation of the Sch?ttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
【24h】

Evaluation of the Sch?ttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee

机译:小儿膝关节舒张技术的评估

获取原文

摘要

Background: The Sch?ttle point is commonly used for anatomic femoral tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. This technique has not been previously validated in the skeletally immature patient, in whom femoral tunnel placement may put the distal femoral physis at risk of iatrogenic injury. Hypothesis: Interobserver reliability for femoral tunnel placement will be higher in adult knees compared with pediatric knees. Study Design: Cross-sectional study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We selected 30 perfect lateral radiographs for this study: 20 from pediatric knees (mean patient age, 10 years; range, 8-11 years) and 10 from adult knees (mean patient age, 18.5 years; range, 18-23 years). Six observers with varying levels of clinical experience evaluated each radiograph and approximated the site of the MPFL femoral tunnel using the Sch?ttle technique. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities for femoral tunnel placement were evaluated. Statistical analysis was used to compare measurements. Results: During initial interobserver measurements, the diameter of the composite perfect circles averaged 9.0 and 6.8 mm in adult and pediatric knees, respectively ( P = .004). At repeat measurement, circles averaged 9.8 and 7.3 mm in adult and pediatric knees, respectively ( P = .0001). Femoral tunnel placement intraobserver variance averaged 2.9 mm in adult knees (range, 1.9-4.0 mm) and 2.3 mm in pediatric knees (range, 1.9-2.9 mm). This difference was not significant ( P = .14). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that interobserver variance is actually greater in adult knees compared with pediatric knees, although interobserver variance was significantly different for both populations. Additionally, intraobserver variance is small on repeat measures, demonstrating that the Sch?ttle technique is reproducible for individual observers. Sources of this increased variance between observers are differences in agreement on the bony landmarks required for the Sch?ttle technique. Due to this variability in tunnel placement, we recommend caution when the Sch?ttle technique is used in pediatric knees to avoid iatrogenic injury to the distal femoral physis during femoral tunnel placement.
机译:背景:在?股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建过程中,Sch?ttle点通常用于解剖性股骨隧道放置。这项技术尚未在骨骼未成熟的患者中得到验证,该患者的股骨隧道放置可能会使远端股骨物理体遭受医源性损伤的风险。假设:与小儿膝盖相比,成年膝盖的观察者在股骨隧道放置方面的可靠性更高。研究设计:横断面研究(诊断);证据等级:3。方法:我们为这项研究选择了30幅完美的侧位X线照片:小儿膝盖20例(平均患者年龄10岁;范围8-11岁)和成年膝盖10例(平均患者年龄18.5岁;平均年龄18.5岁)。范围,18-23岁)。六名具有不同临床经验水平的观察者对每张X光片进行了评估,并使用Sch?ttle技术估算了MPFL股骨隧道的位置。评估了股内隧道放置的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。统计分析用于比较测量结果。结果:在最初的观察者间测量中,成人和小儿膝盖的复合完美圆直径分别为9.0毫米和6.8毫米(P = .004)。在重复测量时,成年和小儿膝盖的平均圆圈分别为9.8和7.3 mm(P = .0001)。成人膝关节的股骨隧道放置观察者方差平均为2.9 mm(范围为1.9-4.0 mm),小儿膝部为2.3 mm(范围为1.9-2.9 mm)。这种差异不明显(P = 0.14)。结论:这项研究表明,尽管两种人群的观察者间差异明显不同,但成人膝上的观察者间差异实际上要比儿科膝盖大。此外,观察者内部的差异在重复测量中很小,这表明Sch?ttle技术对于单个观察者是可重现的。观察者之间这种增加的差异的根源是Sch?ttle技术所需的骨性界标的一致性差异。由于隧道放置的可变性,我们建议在小儿膝盖中使用Sch?ttle技术时要小心,以免在股骨隧道放置期间对远端股骨物理性医源性损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号