首页> 外文期刊>Orthodontic Journal of Nepal >An Evaluation of Smart Clip Self-Ligating Bracket System: Comparison of Treatment Outcome and Patient Response between Self-ligating and Conventional Pre-adjusted Edgewise Appliance
【24h】

An Evaluation of Smart Clip Self-Ligating Bracket System: Comparison of Treatment Outcome and Patient Response between Self-ligating and Conventional Pre-adjusted Edgewise Appliance

机译:智能夹子自固定支架系统的评估:自结扎和常规预调节Edgewise矫治器的治疗结果和患者反应的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: A number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the friction characteristics of self-ligating brackets, however there have been only few studies which have actually evaluated the clinical efficiency of these self-ligating brackets. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficiency of Smart Clip self-ligating bracket in terms of treatment time, number of appointments, ABO score, and patient perception by comparing it with a pre-adjusted edgewise appliance system (MBT). Materials & Method: A prospective in vivo study in which twelve patients were bonded with Smart Clip self-ligating appliance and twelve patients were bonded with conventional pre adjusted edgewise appliance (MBT). The record of number of visits was maintained for each visit. At the end of treatment all 24 patients were asked to fill a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. Post-treatment OPG and study models of all cases were evaluated for ABO score. Result: Average treatment time with Smart Clip self-ligating bracket was 4.5 months shorter than conventional pre-adjusted edgewise bracket. Mean number of appointments with Smart-Clip self-ligating brackets were 6.5 less than conventional pre-adjusted edgewise bracket. There was no significant difference in the quality of treatment with both groups having similar ABO scores. Patient perception to treatment in both the groups was also similar, except that patients with Smart Clip appliance system experienced more pain during wire insertion. Smart Clip group patients had greater difficulty in maintaining oral hygiene. Conclusion: Smart Clip bracket system is efficient in reducing the treatment time, but the quality of orthodontic treatment is similar to conventional pre-adjusted edgewise system. Patient perception for both the brackets is similar.
机译:简介:已经进行了许多研究来评估自结扎支架的摩擦特性,但是,只有很少的研究实际评估了这些自结扎支架的临床疗效。目的:将Smart Clip自结扎支架与预先调整的Edgewise矫治器系统(MBT)进行比较,以评估其在治疗时间,预约次数,ABO评分和患者感知方面的临床疗效。材料与方法:一项前瞻性体内研究,其中十二名患者使用Smart Clip自结扎器械粘结,十二名患者使用传统的预调节边缘器械(MBT)粘结。每次访问均保留访问次数记录。在治疗结束时,要求所有24名患者填写一份包含10个问题的问卷。对所有病例的治疗后OPG和研究模型进行ABO评分评估。结果:Smart Clip自结扎支架的平均治疗时间比传统的预先调整的边缘支架短4.5个月。使用Smart-Clip自结扎支架的平均约会次数比传统的预先调整的边式支架少6.5。两组的ABO评分相似,治疗质量无明显差异。除使用Smart Clip矫治器系统的患者在导线插入过程中遭受更多的痛苦外,两组患者对治疗的看法也相似。 Smart Clip组患者在维持口腔卫生方面存在更大的困难。结论:Smart Clip托槽系统在减少治疗时间方面是有效的,但是正畸治疗的质量与传统的预调整边缘系统相似。两个支架的患者感觉相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号