...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Knotless Fixation Is Stronger and Less Variable Than Knotted Constructs in Securing a Suture Loop
【24h】

Knotless Fixation Is Stronger and Less Variable Than Knotted Constructs in Securing a Suture Loop

机译:在确保缝合环安全性方面,打结固定比打结结构更坚固,变化更少

获取原文

摘要

Background: Historically, tendon-to-bone fixation has relied on knot tying. However, considerable variability exists in knot-tying strength among surgeons. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of knotted and knotless fixation and to evaluate variability among surgeons. The hypothesis was that knotless constructs would be stronger and have less variability as compared with knotted constructs. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 34 orthopaedic surgeons participated in a laboratory study to compare knotted and knotless constructs, where 104 knotted constructs were performed with No. 2 suture, 21 knotless constructs with No. 2 suture (K2 group), and 79 knotless constructs with suture tape (KT group). Mechanical testing was performed to compare load at 3 mm of displacement, load to failure, and stiffness of each construct. Results: The mean load at 3 mm of displacement was greatest in the KT group, with significant differences among all 3 groups ( P < .001). Load to failure was significantly greater in the KT group as compared with the K2 group and the knotted group ( P < .001), but there was no difference between the K2 and knotted groups ( P ≥ .999). Stiffness and displacement were also greatest in the KT group. Based on the F test, the variance in load to failure was significantly different between the knotted and knotless constructs, with the knotted group demonstrating greater variability (SD, 94 N) than the KT (SD, 38 N) and K2 (SD, 17 N) groups ( P < .001). Conclusion: Knotless fixation with suture tape had improved biomechanical performance as compared with knots or knotless fixation with No. 2 suture. In addition, knotless fixation had less variability in biomechanical properties among multiple surgeons. Clinical Relevance: This study may be relevant for surgeons choosing between knotted and knotless constructs as well as for considerations in the design of rotator cuff repair constructs.
机译:背景:从历史上看,肌腱到骨的固定依赖于打结。但是,外科医生的打结强度存在很大的差异。目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较打结和无打结固定的生物力学特性,并评估外科医生之间的差异。假设是,与打结的构造相比,无打结的构造会更坚固,变异性更小。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:总共34位整形外科医生参加了一项实验室研究,以比较打结和无打结的结构,其中用2号缝合线进行104个打结结构,用2号缝合线进行21个无结结构(K2组),使用79个打结的无结结构。缝合带(KT组)。进行了机械测试,以比较位移3 mm时的载荷,载荷对破坏的影响以及每个结构的刚度。结果:KT组在位移3 mm时的平均载荷最大,所有3组之间的差异均显着(P <.001)。与K2组和打结组相比,KT组的失败负荷明显更大(P <.001),但K2组和打结组之间没有差异(P≥.999)。 KT组的刚度和位移也最大。根据F检验,打结和无打结结构的破坏载荷差异显着,打结组的变异性(SD,94 N)比KT(SD,38 N)和K2(SD,17)大。 N)组(P <.001)。结论:与2号缝合结或无结固定相比,缝合带无结固定具有更好的生物力学性能。此外,无结固定术在多位外科医生中的生物力学特性变异性较小。临床意义:该研究可能与外科医生在打结结构和无结结构之间进行选择以及在肩袖修复结构设计中的考虑有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号