...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Analysis of Glenoid Inter-anchor Distance with an All-Suture Anchor System
【24h】

Analysis of Glenoid Inter-anchor Distance with an All-Suture Anchor System

机译:全缝锚固系统分析关节盂间距离

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors are commonly used techniques. More recently developed all-suture systems employ smaller diameter anchors, which increase repair contact area and allow greater placement density on narrow surfaces such as the glenoid. Our goal is investigate the strength characteristics of various inter-anchor distances in a human glenoid model. Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric glenoids were potted after the labrum was excised. The glenoids were then implanted with 1.4 mm all-suture anchors (Juggerknot, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) at varying inter-anchor distances. Anchors were implanted adjacent to one another or at 2 mm, 3 mm, or 5 mm distances using a template with pre-drilled holes. The glenoids were then underwent single cycle pullout testing using a test frame (Instron 8521, Instron Inc., Norwood, MA). A 5 N preload was applied to the construct and the actuator was driven away from the shoulder at a rate of 12.5mm/s as seen in Figure 1. Force and displacement were collected from the test frame actuator at a rate of 500 Hz. The primary outcomes were failure strength and stiffness. Stiffness was calculated from the initial linear region of the force displacement curve. Failure strength was defined as the first local maximum inflection point in the force displacement curve. Results: During load to fail testing, all but three of the specimens had both anchors pull out of the glenoid. The other mode of failure included one or both of the sutures failing. Stiffness was 13.52 ± 3.8, 17.97 ± 5.02, 17.59 ± 4.65 and 18.95 ± 4.67 N/mm for the adjacent, 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm treatment groups as shown Table 1. The adjacent group had a significantly lower stiffness compared to the other treatment groups. Failure strength was 48.68 ± 20.64, 76.16 ± 23.78, 73.19 ± 35.83 and 87.04 ± 34.67 N for the adjacent, 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm treatment groups as shown in Table 1. The adjacent group had a significantly lower failure strength compared to the other treatment groups. Conclusion: These data provide biomechanical evidence that in the glenoid, small diameter all-suture anchors may be implanted as close as 2 mm to one another without significantly decreasing their strength characteristics.
机译:目的:使用缝合锚钉进行关节镜下肩关节稳定术是常用的技术。最近开发的全缝合系统采用直径较小的锚钉,这增加了修复接触面积并允许在狭窄表面(如关节盂)上放置更大的密度。我们的目标是研究人关节盂模型中各种锚间距离的强度特征。方法:切除唇唇后,盆栽十二个新鲜冷冻的人体尸体盂盂。然后将关节盂植入不同固定点间距离的1.4 mm全缝合锚钉(Juggerknot,Biomet,Warsaw,IN)。使用带有预钻孔的模板,将锚钉彼此相邻或以2 mm,3 mm或5 mm的距离植入。然后使用测试架(Instron 8521,Instron Inc.,Norwood,MA)对关节盂进行单周期牵拉测试。如图5所示,将5 N的预紧力施加到结构上,并以12.5mm / s的速度将执行器从肩部推开。以500 Hz的速度从测试架执行器收集力和位移。主要结果是破坏强度和刚度。由力位移曲线的初始线性区域计算刚度。破坏强度定义为力位移曲线中的第一个局部最大拐点。结果:在加载失败测试期间,除三个样本外,所有样本的两个锚都从关节盂中拔出。另一失败模式包括一个或两个缝合线失败。如表1所示,相邻的2 mm,3 mm和5 mm治疗组的刚度分别为13.52±3.8、17.97±5.02、17.59±4.65和18.95±4.67 N / mm。其他治疗组。如表1所示,相邻的2 mm,3 mm和5 mm治疗组的破坏强度分别为48.68±20.64、76.16±23.78、73.19±35.83和87.04±34.67N。相邻治疗组的破坏强度明显低于其他治疗组。结论:这些数据提供了生物力学证据,即在关节盂中,小直径的全缝合锚钉可以彼此相距2 mm植入而不会显着降低其强度特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号